RE: Go and chess

go is not simple at all. much more difficult to became an expert in in fact
than chess.
Japanese shoogi is more interesting than chess but go comfounds me...
-----Original Message-----
?·?o?l : Asher Haig <ahaig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
?¶?æ : deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<deleuze-guattari@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
?ú?? : 2000?N6??7?ú 12:55
???¼ : Re: Go and chess


>on 6/6/00 5:47 PM, Shaun Rawolle at s201330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Rather a mundane question, I'm afraid, but on reading 'Nomadology: the
war
>> machine' I find myself missing some basic cultural capital: what is the
>> game Go? Can someone describe the tactical and strategic axioms of the
game?
>>
>> Bye, Shaun
>>
>
>Go is a simple capture-the-pieces-to-control-the-board game (I believe)
from
>China. It's played on a grid. Stones are placed on the intersections of
the
>grid. Two colors (Black and White traditionally) are used. The object is
to
>surround stones of the opposite color on all possible intersections so
that
>no connecting stone can be placed. If stones are trapped, they are removed
>from the board and a hole remains. The process of taking board is done by
>capturing pieces, but the end-goal is to control as much of the board as
>possible.
>
>If you want a visual, yahoo games has an online version.
>http://games.yahoo.com/
>
>---
>
>Asher Haig ahaig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Greenhill Debate Dartmouth 2004
>
>


Partial thread listing: