>Could you perhaps explain what you mean by "a botched construction of
>the body without organs" and maybe refer to the place in which you're
>getting this idea?
"there is desire as soon as there is a machine or 'body without organs'.
but there are bodies without organs like hardnened empty envelopes, because
their organic components have been blown up too quickly and too violently,
an 'overdose'. there are bodies without organs which are cancerous and
fascist, in black holes or machines of abolition. how can desire
outmaneuver all that by managing its plane of immanence and of consistence
which each time runs up against these dangers?"
the body without organs ... not a type but an event.
..................................
nathan strait, bucknell university
associative professor of chaosophy
http://coral.bucknell.edu/~strait/
>the body without organs" and maybe refer to the place in which you're
>getting this idea?
"there is desire as soon as there is a machine or 'body without organs'.
but there are bodies without organs like hardnened empty envelopes, because
their organic components have been blown up too quickly and too violently,
an 'overdose'. there are bodies without organs which are cancerous and
fascist, in black holes or machines of abolition. how can desire
outmaneuver all that by managing its plane of immanence and of consistence
which each time runs up against these dangers?"
the body without organs ... not a type but an event.
..................................
nathan strait, bucknell university
associative professor of chaosophy
http://coral.bucknell.edu/~strait/