Re: BWO

>
> On Thu, 17 Aug 1995 17:25:01 +0400 <h.miller@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > At the risk of sounding stupid could someone explain to me what D&G mean
> >when they discuss 'becoming woman' ?
>
> To second Stephen's response, there's nothing stupid in this query. His
> reference to Grosz's work is quite useful. At the risk of being self-serving/
> referential, I'm providing an excerpt from my interview w/ Guattari on this
> question. The text of the complete interview is archived (somewhere) on
> the D&G-archive (try July 93), and also has been published by PRE/TEXT 14.3-4
> (1993 [publication 1995]): 215-250, under the title "Pragmatic/Machinic:
> Discussion with Fe'lix Guattari".

I've html-ized the "Pragmatic/Machinic" interview. You can get to if from
the D-G Home page, or directly:
http://www.dc.peachnet.edu/~mnunes/guattari.html

--Mark


------------------

Partial thread listing: