ARCHITECTURE: VR. Falling Water. FLlWright.

From: IN%"IPCT-L%[email protected]" "Interpersonal Computing and Tec
ology" 21-MAR-1992 17:57:05.48
To: Multiple recipients of list IPCT-L <IPCT-L%[email protected]>
Subj: RE: Computer applications in architecture etc.

Message-id: <[email protected]>
Received: from JNET-DAEMON by PSUARCH.Bitnet; Sat, 21 Mar 92 17:56 EDT
Received: From CUNYVMV2(MAILER) by PSUARCH with Jnet id 6512 for [email protected];
Sat, 21 Mar 92 17:56 EDT
Received: from CUNYVM by CUNYVM.BITNET (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 9296; Sat,
21 Mar 92 17:50:32 EST
Received: from by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
Sat, 21 Mar 92 17:50:31 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
id 2625; Sat, 21 Mar 92 17:50:44 EST
Received: from UGA.BITNET by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 1383;
Sat, 21 Mar 92 17:50:43 EST
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1992 17:47:00 EST
From: Interpersonal Computing and Technology <IPCT%[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Computer applications in architecture etc.
Sender: Interpersonal Computing and Technology
<IPCT-L%[email protected]>
To: Multiple recipients of list IPCT-L <IPCT-L%[email protected]>
Reply-to: Interpersonal Computing and Technology
<IPCT-L%[email protected]>

From: IN%"[email protected]" "STU DENENBERG" 21-MAR-1992 17:36:27.09

Gerald M. Phillips writes:

>Re: comments by Professor Jahn...we get an insight into this virtual
>reality business. As a Pennsylvanian, I have seen the Falling Water House.
>It cannot be duplicated on a computer. It is a house. It is reality.
>In my work with pharmaceutical researchers I learned that, despite protesta
>tions to the contrary by animal rights activists, you cannot duplicate the
>workings of a human body on a computer. A body is reality. A computer is
>a game.

While it is certainly true that computer models are not reality, the same
thing can be said of words themselves. The fact that words are only
symbols does not stop us from trying to communicate with them (or no one
would be reading this). Let's not write off computer models because of
their limitations --- they have strengths also ---
they can offer insights if used properly (like words ).
Any symbolic representation can be used to obfuscate as well as illuminate;
let's be fair.

>I am also intrigued by the use of the word "interpersonnel" to refer to
>the main thrust on the network. I should call to the attention of all
>and sundry that there is a discipline referred to as "interpersonal
>communication." It is affiliated with the Speech Communication Association,
>and numbers around 1,500 specialists in its ranks. A lot of the discussion
>on this network is rediscovery of the wheel. There is a rich literature
>dealing with the techniques and management of friendship and interpersonal
>communication. Much of this stems from the original contributions of
>George Herbert Mead and Harry Stack Sullivan.

On the other hand...
the nice part of reinventing the wheel is that, if it breaks, it's *your*
wheel and you know how it works and you stand a better chance of fixing it.


Dr. Stewart A. Denenberg BITNET: [email protected]
Dept. of Computer Science PHONE: 518 - 564 -2786 ( or 2788 )
SUNY, Plattsburgh NY 12901 INTERNET: [email protected]
Partial thread listing: