Date sent: 11-NOV-1992 14:32:13
>From: IN%"[email protected]" "Basic Design (Art and Architecture)" 11-NOV
-1992 08:10:08.23
>To: IN%"[email protected]" "Jennifer Kime", IN%"CARA8789@xxxxxxxxxxx
TNET" "Adam Carangelo"
>CC:
>Subj: Call for papers
>
>Received: from ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu (MAILER_L@UBVM) by splava.cc.plattsburgh.edu
> (PMDF #12405) id <01GR0O7SKKSK987VB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,
> 11 Nov 1992 08:08 EST
>Received: by UBVM (Mailer R2.08 PTF008) id 5469; Wed, 11 Nov 92 08:06:30 EST
>Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 09:34:32 MET
>From: Martin Masek <usarmase@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Call for papers
>Sender: "Basic Design (Art and Architecture)" <[email protected]>
>To: Jennifer Kime <[email protected]>,
> Adam Carangelo <[email protected]>
>Reply-to: "Basic Design (Art and Architecture)" <[email protected]>
>Message-id: <01GR0O7SKKSK987VB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>X-Envelope-to: CARA8789, KIME9095
>X-To: idforum@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-cc: [email protected]
>
>May be this will be interesting for few subscribers of this list:
>
>
>*****************************************************************
>* CALL FOR PAPERS *
>*****************************************************************
>
> MILLENNIUM
>
>New journal, focused on cultural studies connected with the
>"millennium rupture", first of all on cultural (both artistic and
>non-artistic) development in 2nd millennium and comparative
>studies about the "millennium ruptures". Articles in this journal
>will be published both in Slovak (resp. Czech) and English
>language. Interdisciplinary character of journal does not
>eliminate a possibility of participation of any discipline at
>least on the theoretical level.
>MILLENNIUM has no political goals, however accepts politological
>studies too.
>No.0 of our MILLENNIUM should be a survey of opinions on few
>aspects of millennium rupture.
> **********************************************************
> * PLEASE READ ENCLOSED TEXT AND QUESTIONS DRAFTED THERE. *
> * IF YOU ARE A GOOD MIND TO ANSWER, PLEASE DO IT. *
> **********************************************************
>Your answer will be considered as your kindly permition to
>publish it. We hope, that you understand non-profit character of
>this No.0. Sure we shall mail one print to all authors of No.0.
>MILLENNIUM is bilingual journal: English and Slovak/Czech. Please
>use only one of these languages in your answer.
>
> ************** TERM: DECEMBER 10, 1992 ********************
>
>Please move this text to your colleagues without email account.
>
>Martin Masek, Editor
>
>Contact:
>Bukova 10
>811 02 Bratislava
>CzechoSlovakia
>
>Phone: (+42 7) 312 866
>Fax: from December 1st 1992 (+42 7) 312 846
>Email: usarmase@xxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> ********
>
> MILLENNIUM RUPTURES
>
>
>Only few generations in human's history had or have an
>opportunity to live in two millenniums. Just contemporary
>generations have this opportunity - we are that "lucky people"
>which have the chance to live both in second and third
>millenniums.
>The end of 19th century is characterized as nostalgical "fin du
>siecle". The break of centuries have brought expressive changes.
>20th century was (or is) radically distinguished from 19th and
>a couple of people reacted to this events very soon. May be they
>have prepared the background of these changes.
>The end of our millennium, as we see it today, is distinguished
>from its general course. What does it mean "second millennium"
>for human's history and what the third? Academy did overstep the
>millennium frontier in prognoses, scenarios or considerations;
>pragmatically or only from clear curiosity.
>We realize, that each day is a "millennium break" - our each day
>had existed 1000 years ago. However, our situation is unique. Our
>date has the ability return us back to the depth of previous
>millenniums and points to the future. It is the reachable
>proximity of decimal date, which can present us all previous
>ruptures. Do we have an interest on this presentation? Are we
>fatally connected with it or is it only an outside interest?
>We live only in the second millennium - and human's existence is
>older. Besides this fact our date is meaningful only for that
>part of people, which accept or reflect the Christian calendar.
>Return to the millenniums before Christ is only a symmetrical
>back-projection of our culture. This millenniums had different
>orders and dates. Do we adapt history before Christ to our
>culture, our image, our comprehension of the time?
>The year 0 had raptured historical calendar continuity. In spite
>of this fact it is OUR date, which is connected with OUR life:
>date of birth, dead of near people, personal or communal events.
>It is a waiting for new Christs or/and anti-Christs, prophets,
>ends of the world, miracles, changes, breaks. That is why the
>millennium break is the occasion to evaluate all what was
>happened in "our time"; the occasion look at the direction of the
>human development.
>These questions are typical first of all for that part of
>community, which accepts or reflects our calendar. Is it the same
>sensful occasion for people of different calendars too?
>Each nowadays rupture has less or more global character. That
>previous ruptures could not have this character or their cultural
>horizon could not point to their global character. The
>globalization of the character of calendar rupture in the
>connection with the existence of more calendars faces us to
>paradox questions on the natural coherences of different
>cultures, calendars, historical concepts, understanding of the
>time, ruptures, beginnings and ends. Are these paradoxes the
>manifestation of the globalization? Is the globalization
>symptomatic for coming rupture?
>Millennium rupture is only one of larger number of ruptures.
>Although we ask only on the coming rupture, these facts bring us
>to the more universal term "periodical rupture" and its meaning
>in human history.
>
>
>Editors
The idea's represented in this paper on Millenium Rupture have intrigued
me greatly. Please provide me with the titles of any subsequent literature
on this topic.
Adam J. Carangelo
>From: IN%"[email protected]" "Basic Design (Art and Architecture)" 11-NOV
-1992 08:10:08.23
>To: IN%"[email protected]" "Jennifer Kime", IN%"CARA8789@xxxxxxxxxxx
TNET" "Adam Carangelo"
>CC:
>Subj: Call for papers
>
>Received: from ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu (MAILER_L@UBVM) by splava.cc.plattsburgh.edu
> (PMDF #12405) id <01GR0O7SKKSK987VB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,
> 11 Nov 1992 08:08 EST
>Received: by UBVM (Mailer R2.08 PTF008) id 5469; Wed, 11 Nov 92 08:06:30 EST
>Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 09:34:32 MET
>From: Martin Masek <usarmase@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Call for papers
>Sender: "Basic Design (Art and Architecture)" <[email protected]>
>To: Jennifer Kime <[email protected]>,
> Adam Carangelo <[email protected]>
>Reply-to: "Basic Design (Art and Architecture)" <[email protected]>
>Message-id: <01GR0O7SKKSK987VB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>X-Envelope-to: CARA8789, KIME9095
>X-To: idforum@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>X-cc: [email protected]
>
>May be this will be interesting for few subscribers of this list:
>
>
>*****************************************************************
>* CALL FOR PAPERS *
>*****************************************************************
>
> MILLENNIUM
>
>New journal, focused on cultural studies connected with the
>"millennium rupture", first of all on cultural (both artistic and
>non-artistic) development in 2nd millennium and comparative
>studies about the "millennium ruptures". Articles in this journal
>will be published both in Slovak (resp. Czech) and English
>language. Interdisciplinary character of journal does not
>eliminate a possibility of participation of any discipline at
>least on the theoretical level.
>MILLENNIUM has no political goals, however accepts politological
>studies too.
>No.0 of our MILLENNIUM should be a survey of opinions on few
>aspects of millennium rupture.
> **********************************************************
> * PLEASE READ ENCLOSED TEXT AND QUESTIONS DRAFTED THERE. *
> * IF YOU ARE A GOOD MIND TO ANSWER, PLEASE DO IT. *
> **********************************************************
>Your answer will be considered as your kindly permition to
>publish it. We hope, that you understand non-profit character of
>this No.0. Sure we shall mail one print to all authors of No.0.
>MILLENNIUM is bilingual journal: English and Slovak/Czech. Please
>use only one of these languages in your answer.
>
> ************** TERM: DECEMBER 10, 1992 ********************
>
>Please move this text to your colleagues without email account.
>
>Martin Masek, Editor
>
>Contact:
>Bukova 10
>811 02 Bratislava
>CzechoSlovakia
>
>Phone: (+42 7) 312 866
>Fax: from December 1st 1992 (+42 7) 312 846
>Email: usarmase@xxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> ********
>
> MILLENNIUM RUPTURES
>
>
>Only few generations in human's history had or have an
>opportunity to live in two millenniums. Just contemporary
>generations have this opportunity - we are that "lucky people"
>which have the chance to live both in second and third
>millenniums.
>The end of 19th century is characterized as nostalgical "fin du
>siecle". The break of centuries have brought expressive changes.
>20th century was (or is) radically distinguished from 19th and
>a couple of people reacted to this events very soon. May be they
>have prepared the background of these changes.
>The end of our millennium, as we see it today, is distinguished
>from its general course. What does it mean "second millennium"
>for human's history and what the third? Academy did overstep the
>millennium frontier in prognoses, scenarios or considerations;
>pragmatically or only from clear curiosity.
>We realize, that each day is a "millennium break" - our each day
>had existed 1000 years ago. However, our situation is unique. Our
>date has the ability return us back to the depth of previous
>millenniums and points to the future. It is the reachable
>proximity of decimal date, which can present us all previous
>ruptures. Do we have an interest on this presentation? Are we
>fatally connected with it or is it only an outside interest?
>We live only in the second millennium - and human's existence is
>older. Besides this fact our date is meaningful only for that
>part of people, which accept or reflect the Christian calendar.
>Return to the millenniums before Christ is only a symmetrical
>back-projection of our culture. This millenniums had different
>orders and dates. Do we adapt history before Christ to our
>culture, our image, our comprehension of the time?
>The year 0 had raptured historical calendar continuity. In spite
>of this fact it is OUR date, which is connected with OUR life:
>date of birth, dead of near people, personal or communal events.
>It is a waiting for new Christs or/and anti-Christs, prophets,
>ends of the world, miracles, changes, breaks. That is why the
>millennium break is the occasion to evaluate all what was
>happened in "our time"; the occasion look at the direction of the
>human development.
>These questions are typical first of all for that part of
>community, which accepts or reflects our calendar. Is it the same
>sensful occasion for people of different calendars too?
>Each nowadays rupture has less or more global character. That
>previous ruptures could not have this character or their cultural
>horizon could not point to their global character. The
>globalization of the character of calendar rupture in the
>connection with the existence of more calendars faces us to
>paradox questions on the natural coherences of different
>cultures, calendars, historical concepts, understanding of the
>time, ruptures, beginnings and ends. Are these paradoxes the
>manifestation of the globalization? Is the globalization
>symptomatic for coming rupture?
>Millennium rupture is only one of larger number of ruptures.
>Although we ask only on the coming rupture, these facts bring us
>to the more universal term "periodical rupture" and its meaning
>in human history.
>
>
>Editors
The idea's represented in this paper on Millenium Rupture have intrigued
me greatly. Please provide me with the titles of any subsequent literature
on this topic.
Adam J. Carangelo