ARCHITECTURE: Unions and Innovative Technology.

From: IN%"[email protected]" "List for the discussion of Buckminster Fulle
r'
s works" 12-DEC-1992 07:30:20.13
To: Howard Lawrence <[email protected]>
CC:
Subj: RE: Rest in Peace?

Message-id: <[email protected]>
Received: from JNET-DAEMON by PSUARCH.Bitnet; Sat, 12 Dec 92 07:29 EDT
Received: From PSUVM(MAILER) by PSUARCH with Jnet id 6606 for HRL@PSUARCH; Sat,
12 Dec 92 07:29 EDT
Received: from PSUVM.BITNET by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 6333;
Sat, 12 Dec 92 07:23:53 EST
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 08:31:33 GMT
From: D Anton Sherwood <dasher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Rest in Peace?
Sender: List for the discussion of Buckminster Fuller's works
<[email protected]>
To: Howard Lawrence <[email protected]>
Reply-to: List for the discussion of Buckminster Fuller's works
<[email protected]>
Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was NETNEWS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In article <GEODESIC%92120911193942@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Dennis R Short
<[email protected]> writes:
>
>An important question for domes and all non-traditional architecture is
>how much impact does the attitude of mortgage bankers and building code people
>have on restraining or blocking innovative building technologies??

I heard that some students wanted to build a dome as a class project, but
couldn't get permission from the almighty county planning agency because the
proposed structure wouldn't have studs every sixteen inches.

In "Grunch of Giants" (and probably elsewhere, I suppose), Fuller tells of
the barriers he met with the Dymaxion House. Zoning officials wouldn't
allow it to be installed unless union plumbers and electricians were hired
to rip out all the pipes and wires and put them back in. This, of course,
made the world safe for tradition. Fuller concluded that capitalism has got
to go. *sigh* If that's capitalism, I'm Ross Perot....
--
Anton Sherwood dasher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 415 267 0685 1800 Market St #207, San Francisco 94102 USA
Partial thread listing: