From: IN%"URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" "Urban Planning Discussion List"
31-AUG-1993 19:47:50.06
To: IN%"HRL@xxxxxxxxxxxx" "Howard Lawrence"
CC:
Subj: RE: discussion list on mobility
Return-path: <@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:[email protected]>
Received: from psuvm.psu.edu by ARCH.PSU.EDU (PMDF #12866) id
<01H2EO1FD2SW8ZE65D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 31 Aug 1993 19:47 EDT
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id
1906; Tue, 31 Aug 93 19:43:17 EDT
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
(LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0638; Tue, 31 Aug 1993 19:43:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 93 02:41:50 TUR
From: NORA Quinlan <nora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: discussion list on mobility
In-reply-to: <9308301451.AA06312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Urban Planning Discussion List <URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Howard Lawrence <HRL@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Urban Planning Discussion List <URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-id: <01H2EO1FD2SW8ZE65D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Comments: To: Urban Planning Discussion List
<URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jeroen:
As far as I know, there is no discussion group on mobility in this
country. Econet (a non-profit group that charges for connection to e-mail
conferences, and other on-line services) has mobility discussions as part
of it's 'energy' conference, but mobility issues are somewhat secondary to
issues affecting recreational bicycling. It is primarily activists and not
planners or other transportation professionals. Other than that, there
isn't much. Even the professionls interested in the subject tend to be
divided between the social scientists (who lean more towards
transportation research and engineering societies) and urban designers,
who tend towards the architecture and planning groups.
Bruce Epperson@
nora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
31-AUG-1993 19:47:50.06
To: IN%"HRL@xxxxxxxxxxxx" "Howard Lawrence"
CC:
Subj: RE: discussion list on mobility
Return-path: <@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:[email protected]>
Received: from psuvm.psu.edu by ARCH.PSU.EDU (PMDF #12866) id
<01H2EO1FD2SW8ZE65D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 31 Aug 1993 19:47 EDT
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id
1906; Tue, 31 Aug 93 19:43:17 EDT
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
(LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0638; Tue, 31 Aug 1993 19:43:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 93 02:41:50 TUR
From: NORA Quinlan <nora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: discussion list on mobility
In-reply-to: <9308301451.AA06312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Urban Planning Discussion List <URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Howard Lawrence <HRL@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Urban Planning Discussion List <URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-id: <01H2EO1FD2SW8ZE65D@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Comments: To: Urban Planning Discussion List
<URBAN-L%TREARN.BITNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jeroen:
As far as I know, there is no discussion group on mobility in this
country. Econet (a non-profit group that charges for connection to e-mail
conferences, and other on-line services) has mobility discussions as part
of it's 'energy' conference, but mobility issues are somewhat secondary to
issues affecting recreational bicycling. It is primarily activists and not
planners or other transportation professionals. Other than that, there
isn't much. Even the professionls interested in the subject tend to be
divided between the social scientists (who lean more towards
transportation research and engineering societies) and urban designers,
who tend towards the architecture and planning groups.
Bruce Epperson@
nora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx