- - The original note follows - -
Path: psuvm!news.cac.psu.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!udel!news!uunet!
magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!es
4r+
From: "Elizabeth A. Stoltenberg" <es4r+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: alt.architecture
Subject: Re: Jury Reviews
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1993 12:49:06 -0400
Organization: Sophomore, Architecture, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 14
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <ogcRC2G00WBLI4aJEx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <27ou4s$19j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <27pm62INNdv1@xxxxxxx>
<22SEP199317583080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: po5.andrew.cmu.edu
In-Reply-To: <22SEP199317583080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I personally dread reviews of all types. I am currently a 2nd year at
Carnegie Mellon, and I very recently had a mid project review. This is
the first time I have ever had one of these and I think that it was very
helpful. I guess the main reason I don't like final reviews is that you
have to defend your work and then you get all sorts of feedback which is
basically useless to you because the project is over. A mid project
review on the other hand is very helpful. It gives the arcitect a
chance to take the feedback they got in review and actually put it to
good use. And although I hate them with a passion, I can see the
rational behind them. We, as architects are going to have to be able to
present our work in a way which is convincing to the client. So
basically this is just preparing us for what is yet to come.
-Elizabeth
Path: psuvm!news.cac.psu.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!udel!news!uunet!
magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!es
4r+
From: "Elizabeth A. Stoltenberg" <es4r+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: alt.architecture
Subject: Re: Jury Reviews
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1993 12:49:06 -0400
Organization: Sophomore, Architecture, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 14
Distribution: usa
Message-ID: <ogcRC2G00WBLI4aJEx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <27ou4s$19j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <27pm62INNdv1@xxxxxxx>
<22SEP199317583080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: po5.andrew.cmu.edu
In-Reply-To: <22SEP199317583080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I personally dread reviews of all types. I am currently a 2nd year at
Carnegie Mellon, and I very recently had a mid project review. This is
the first time I have ever had one of these and I think that it was very
helpful. I guess the main reason I don't like final reviews is that you
have to defend your work and then you get all sorts of feedback which is
basically useless to you because the project is over. A mid project
review on the other hand is very helpful. It gives the arcitect a
chance to take the feedback they got in review and actually put it to
good use. And although I hate them with a passion, I can see the
rational behind them. We, as architects are going to have to be able to
present our work in a way which is convincing to the client. So
basically this is just preparing us for what is yet to come.
-Elizabeth