From: IN%"[email protected]" "A Discussion of Listserv Database Search
Capability" 30-OCT-1993 17:20:04.23
To: IN%"[email protected]" "Multiple recipients of list LDBASE-L"
CC:
Subj: List-ID= header keyword
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Return-path: owner-ldbase-l <@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:owner-ldbase-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from Jnet-DAEMON by ARCH.PSU.EDU (PMDF #12866) id
<01H4QCCYPX2096VJZ1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 30 Oct 1993 17:19 EDT
Received: From PSUVM(MAILER) by PSUARCH with Jnet id 8921 for HRL@PSUARCH; Sat,
30 Oct 1993 17:19 EST
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
(LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3223; Sat, 30 Oct 1993 17:12:46 -0400
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1993 17:10:00 EDT
From: "Peter M. Weiss +1 814 863 1843" <PMW1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: List-ID= header keyword
Sender: A Discussion of Listserv Database Search Capability
<[email protected]>
To: Multiple recipients of list LDBASE-L <[email protected]>
Reply-to: A Discussion of Listserv Database Search Capability
<[email protected]>
Message-id: <01H4QCCYPX2096VJZ1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
It turns out that searching the LISTS database for an explicit list
might not "hit". Why? because the listname might not be referenced
either in the list TITLE, or a List-ID= header keyword might be omitted.
I've added the List-ID=listname to my lists.
A "LIST GLOBAL /listname" would reference your list, regardless.
/Pete (pmw1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) -- co-owner LDBASE-L, TQM-L, FINAID-L, et -L
--
Peter M. Weiss "The 'NET' never naps" +1 814 863 1843
31 Shields Bldg. -- Penn State Univ -- University Park, PA USA 16802-1202
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:09:57 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at LISTS.PSU.EDU (1.8e)"
<LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: File: "DESIGN-L LOG9311"
To: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-ELNK-AV: 0
Capability" 30-OCT-1993 17:20:04.23
To: IN%"[email protected]" "Multiple recipients of list LDBASE-L"
CC:
Subj: List-ID= header keyword
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Return-path: owner-ldbase-l <@PSUVM.PSU.EDU:owner-ldbase-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from Jnet-DAEMON by ARCH.PSU.EDU (PMDF #12866) id
<01H4QCCYPX2096VJZ1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 30 Oct 1993 17:19 EDT
Received: From PSUVM(MAILER) by PSUARCH with Jnet id 8921 for HRL@PSUARCH; Sat,
30 Oct 1993 17:19 EST
Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU
(LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3223; Sat, 30 Oct 1993 17:12:46 -0400
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1993 17:10:00 EDT
From: "Peter M. Weiss +1 814 863 1843" <PMW1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: List-ID= header keyword
Sender: A Discussion of Listserv Database Search Capability
<[email protected]>
To: Multiple recipients of list LDBASE-L <[email protected]>
Reply-to: A Discussion of Listserv Database Search Capability
<[email protected]>
Message-id: <01H4QCCYPX2096VJZ1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
It turns out that searching the LISTS database for an explicit list
might not "hit". Why? because the listname might not be referenced
either in the list TITLE, or a List-ID= header keyword might be omitted.
I've added the List-ID=listname to my lists.
A "LIST GLOBAL /listname" would reference your list, regardless.
/Pete (pmw1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) -- co-owner LDBASE-L, TQM-L, FINAID-L, et -L
--
Peter M. Weiss "The 'NET' never naps" +1 814 863 1843
31 Shields Bldg. -- Penn State Univ -- University Park, PA USA 16802-1202
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:09:57 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at LISTS.PSU.EDU (1.8e)"
<LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: File: "DESIGN-L LOG9311"
To: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-ELNK-AV: 0