Subject: Re: Ayn Rand
>In <2k3l6i$g9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david sucher (dsucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>&SNYDER JOHN DAVID (snyderjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>&: Architects are not artists? The Pazzi Chapel and the Plaza de Te are not
>>&: examples of High Renaissance and Mannerist Art? Hmm.
>>&No. Architects are not 'artists.'
>>&They may produce, incidentally, spaces which are wonderful, glorious,
>>&awe-inspiring and so forth, and which may meet the squishy definition of
>>&'art.'
>>&It sounds odd perhaps: architects are not 'artists' but may indeed, now
>>&and then, produce something which we can call 'art.' But I think it's so.
>>&David Sucher
>Could you (for better discussion) define 'art' and 'artist' , please!
>In my opinion this is the point where most people are talking about very
>different things without having any idea of the thoughts of the other.
>So: What is art ? Can only 'artists' produce 'art' ?
>And: Is architecture 'art' (or only form and function) ? Is every building
>architecture ( is everey painting or picture 'art') ?
>Maybe this leads to a more qualified discussion about art and architecture.
>So long! ?
| Sub design-l
at psuvm for
>-- a discussion.
>>>>>> Erwin Zierler erwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or c82005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <<<<<
>>>>>> University of Innsbruck, Austria END OF .SIGFILE <<<<<
>In <2k3l6i$g9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david sucher (dsucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>&SNYDER JOHN DAVID (snyderjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>>&: Architects are not artists? The Pazzi Chapel and the Plaza de Te are not
>>&: examples of High Renaissance and Mannerist Art? Hmm.
>>&No. Architects are not 'artists.'
>>&They may produce, incidentally, spaces which are wonderful, glorious,
>>&awe-inspiring and so forth, and which may meet the squishy definition of
>>&'art.'
>>&It sounds odd perhaps: architects are not 'artists' but may indeed, now
>>&and then, produce something which we can call 'art.' But I think it's so.
>>&David Sucher
>Could you (for better discussion) define 'art' and 'artist' , please!
>In my opinion this is the point where most people are talking about very
>different things without having any idea of the thoughts of the other.
>So: What is art ? Can only 'artists' produce 'art' ?
>And: Is architecture 'art' (or only form and function) ? Is every building
>architecture ( is everey painting or picture 'art') ?
>Maybe this leads to a more qualified discussion about art and architecture.
>So long! ?
| Sub design-l
at psuvm for
>-- a discussion.
>>>>>> Erwin Zierler erwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or c82005@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <<<<<
>>>>>> University of Innsbruck, Austria END OF .SIGFILE <<<<<