- - The original note follows - -
From: dsucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (david sucher)
Subject: Re: Ayn Rand
Date: 19 Feb 1994 18:13:17 -0800
Howard Park (gsd94hp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
: I am not a regular reader of this subject thread, but I feel I must add that
: Mr. David Sucher's notion that some people just _are_ artists and that other
: people just are not is naive and, to be frank, bafflingly stupid. Even more
: amazing is the level of self-absorption that must have been necessary to
: conclude that one is in a position to make such decisions regarding an
: entire profession about which one is cripplingly underinformed. As any
: student of architecture knows, the creation of "wonderful, glorious, awe-
: inspiring" spaces is hardly "incidental."
Mr. Park.
Please read more carefully.
I wouldn't be so quick to throw phrases like 'baffingly stupid'
around; it does not reflect well on your University.
Cheers,
David Sucher
From: dsucher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (david sucher)
Subject: Re: Ayn Rand
Date: 19 Feb 1994 18:13:17 -0800
Howard Park (gsd94hp1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
: I am not a regular reader of this subject thread, but I feel I must add that
: Mr. David Sucher's notion that some people just _are_ artists and that other
: people just are not is naive and, to be frank, bafflingly stupid. Even more
: amazing is the level of self-absorption that must have been necessary to
: conclude that one is in a position to make such decisions regarding an
: entire profession about which one is cripplingly underinformed. As any
: student of architecture knows, the creation of "wonderful, glorious, awe-
: inspiring" spaces is hardly "incidental."
Mr. Park.
Please read more carefully.
I wouldn't be so quick to throw phrases like 'baffingly stupid'
around; it does not reflect well on your University.
Cheers,
David Sucher