Subject: Re: more DECON babble
>All of this arguing about DECONSTRUCTIVISM and who the leader is or whatever
>makes me want to hear some other peoples reflections on the subject.
>I would like to throw out some questions...
>Regardless of who the leader is, and forgetting the label, what is decon
>structivism about? What is the so-called methodology... maybe a deeper under
>standing of architecture and related subjects. To Deconstruct something, if I
? ? ?
| | |structure
| |together, unite, join
|of or concerning
>understand correctly, is to cut it open and analyze the composition... or is
? ?
|separate | formal
organization
tion a stylistic expression, to shift and rotate and fold?
>Is this the future of architecture, or a passing phase?
>If it is a passing phase, what will constitute a lasting architecture?
?
|Architects are so driven by fashion that it will pass.
>If you have any insight, please post.
>All of this arguing about DECONSTRUCTIVISM and who the leader is or whatever
>makes me want to hear some other peoples reflections on the subject.
>I would like to throw out some questions...
>Regardless of who the leader is, and forgetting the label, what is decon
>structivism about? What is the so-called methodology... maybe a deeper under
>standing of architecture and related subjects. To Deconstruct something, if I
? ? ?
| | |structure
| |together, unite, join
|of or concerning
>understand correctly, is to cut it open and analyze the composition... or is
? ?
|separate | formal
organization
tion a stylistic expression, to shift and rotate and fold?
>Is this the future of architecture, or a passing phase?
>If it is a passing phase, what will constitute a lasting architecture?
?
|Architects are so driven by fashion that it will pass.
>If you have any insight, please post.