Do we really need all of this bickering and cattyness?
On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, David Sucher wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, r+ma wrote:
>
> > >Those persons so important (or so vulnerable to criticism) for whom
> > >identity would be foolish, tiresome and/or embarassing:
> > >
> > >David Sucher
> > >'nom de net'
> >
> > Is there some reason that you are hung up on 'real' names?
>
> Dear rma:
>
> Do I detect some use of the term 'hung up' as a pejorative?
> Did not my phrasing evince a certain degree of sympathy for persons (such
> as yourself?) who prefer to make slightly snide remarks without
> identifying themselves?
> When your question is phrased in a less conclusory manner (e.g. 'why do
> you think identity of members of a list is important?') it will deserve an
> answer.
>
> David Sucher
>
On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, David Sucher wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 1995, r+ma wrote:
>
> > >Those persons so important (or so vulnerable to criticism) for whom
> > >identity would be foolish, tiresome and/or embarassing:
> > >
> > >David Sucher
> > >'nom de net'
> >
> > Is there some reason that you are hung up on 'real' names?
>
> Dear rma:
>
> Do I detect some use of the term 'hung up' as a pejorative?
> Did not my phrasing evince a certain degree of sympathy for persons (such
> as yourself?) who prefer to make slightly snide remarks without
> identifying themselves?
> When your question is phrased in a less conclusory manner (e.g. 'why do
> you think identity of members of a list is important?') it will deserve an
> answer.
>
> David Sucher
>