Re: your mail

>spn: you have suggested over and over the dichotomy between
>subjective(humanities) and objective(science). this is a dichotomy i
>would like to suggest is far to catagorical. Generally speaking,
>"antihumanist" thought would never accept such a split, rather, it would
>investigate the tradition of how that split eventuated as an historical
>assumption. So i propose that the framework you offer is needd to be
>problematized. From there, if what you are suggesting above is that the
>internet is subjective and thus a design tool, i would submit that it
>might described better as relativistic and self emergent--that is neither
>subjective nor objective.


SCIENCE/HUMANITIES
|
|
SUBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
|
|
science___o___humanities
|
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
obj/sub obj\sub
| |
| "nature" |
| |
______________o__________objective____subjective________o___________________
/|\ | | | | /|\
/ \ |____| |___| / \
/ \
"engineers nature" / \ "architects nature"
/ \
true and false / \ right and wrong
_____________________________/ \_________________________________
Partial thread listing: