your mail

Stephen,

Expected more from you, it appears dear Brian's diagramatical dogmatic
kabbal is a bigger piece than you bit off. Implies a bite by byte
concordance coordinating lingua frankly found a bit to hot doggish,
but waggingly implied to suit choosen psycho image of "deep" meaning
-less ness, man. Hogwash? Dogmeat debaucle up head bangers wrap, in
turban propped whiz bungling jingle lores. Dishpan hands got you
loosing site of signs, western -- if you want to dig back in cynicism,
try imaging tao gates and rising drachmas floating by Santa Monica,
bull levered? No, only bandits use one-arm, whore, drugs. Which
master does he serve?

As, brian, kabbalah, psycho image-maker he serves impressed and minty
fresh breath sheet jockeys. How many sheets to a book? Well depends
on how many fences corral 'em in boys... byte by byte, Concord flight
XXX? This is a dishpan beaming too far below bridges, anchored? some
are and some still float ill upon deparade magazine of ill logic. As
it is oft said in D-Bronx, "blaaaaaaaaaph."

> Dear brian,
> and so i ask you, the diagram below couldn't it also be interpreted as a
> missile? with the people as the fuel?
> (and just how long does it take you to do this lovely artwork?)
> i know you must be into some kind of organicist bifurcationism, but
> remember, asci is linear man, (left to right) and that is a culturally
> constituted, linguistic bias.
>
> |
> science___o___humanities
> |
> / \
> / \
> / \
> / \
> obj/sub obj\sub
> | |
> | "nature" |
> | |
> ______________o__________objective____subjective________o___________________
> /|\ | | | | /|\
> / \ |____| |___| / \
> / \
> "engineers nature" / \ "architects nature"
> / \
> true and false / \ right and wrong
> _____________________________/ \_________________________________

A brief case for concordance bytes in the ass.
Partial thread listing: