question for a list quorum:
the definition/abstract for the list is:
"open discussion of art, architecture, and culture"
which was created to fill in the software form
in order to create the then new list. now i have
been wondering about why 'design' is missing, it
may have been mentioned by Michael earlier (if
remembering correctly) and for pragmatics sake
it worked as a working-title/abstract though i
thought of adding 'design' into the long title:
"open discussion of art, architecture, design, and culture"
though that is way too much, so i am wondering if
the 'art and architecture' could be nixed and the
death-knell could be held until a new abstract,
such as: design and culture, was next to arise...
design-l.v2 'open discussion of design and culture.'
to me it is short, sweet, and to the point and by
getting outside of the art/architecture fandango
could only do some good for opening up creativity
instead of confining it within overdefinitioning.
is it okay with everyone to change the settings,
describing the list and its purpose, to:
- open discussion of design and culture
dissenters? if so, why, what works better, etc.
the definition/abstract for the list is:
"open discussion of art, architecture, and culture"
which was created to fill in the software form
in order to create the then new list. now i have
been wondering about why 'design' is missing, it
may have been mentioned by Michael earlier (if
remembering correctly) and for pragmatics sake
it worked as a working-title/abstract though i
thought of adding 'design' into the long title:
"open discussion of art, architecture, design, and culture"
though that is way too much, so i am wondering if
the 'art and architecture' could be nixed and the
death-knell could be held until a new abstract,
such as: design and culture, was next to arise...
design-l.v2 'open discussion of design and culture.'
to me it is short, sweet, and to the point and by
getting outside of the art/architecture fandango
could only do some good for opening up creativity
instead of confining it within overdefinitioning.
is it okay with everyone to change the settings,
describing the list and its purpose, to:
- open discussion of design and culture
dissenters? if so, why, what works better, etc.