Re: Word on wyrd



On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, bart ross norman wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Anthony J Dominioni wrote:
>
> > To all;
> > I think that, as language is such a bridge to cross in study of
> > Heidegger, that we should be careful to avoid doubletalk between Being
> > and being, perhaps we could use *essent* for 'being', as the essent has
> > essence, though Dasein has Being. Power of the wyrd is incalculable.
> >
> >
> > --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> >
> Yes,
>
> Concerning Mr. Dominioni's brief remarks, I agree that "power of the
> weird (sic) (or did you mean "wired") is incalculable"...though I do not
> think Heidegger would say it in those words.
>
> Bart
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
wyrd was only an archaic spelling of word, I was referring to the power
of language. . .



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: