Re: the nature of <for->

In section 18, (involvement, &c.), Heidegger makes a leap in the meaning
of [for-] when involvement (from hammer through to Dasein) moves from
[for-which] to [for-the-sake-of-which]. The latter shows up only for
Dasein, and the nature of the [for-] is different. Could anyone explain
how this gap is filled and what exactly is the nature of the gap? All
equipment points towards Dasein, but does M.H. make it so from an egoism,
or does he justify this? Where?

Anthony Dominioni
(Tone)
Stony Brook University, NY
adominio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: