Re: ee (re: a d/a s(n)ein)

At 11:23 AM 11/5/95 +0100, you wrote:
>for give me if i repli cate
> onetwothreefourfive pigeonsjustlikethat
>i p/refer clear(blade)ing runs
>to p oint(ment)ing self-se-rious digits
>
>ee called to me
>"truth has become televisionary"
>you see
>
>"If poetry were anything--like dropping an atombomb--which anyone did,
>anyone could become a poet merely by doing the necessary anything; whatever
>that anything might or might not entail. But (as it happens) poetry is
>being, not doing. If you wish to follow, even at a distance, the poet's
>calling (and here, as always, I speak from my own totally biased and
>entirely personal point of view) you've got to come out of the measurable
>doing universe into the immeasurable house of being."--eecummings,
>i:sixnonlectures
>
>so whynot listen to-words speak us
>in stead (butnot op posed) of
>cal cul a ting
>
>musespeak, i can hearthem
>
>will no one a bandon
>quest for dasein--erect arbor
>?
>
>"Si, parmi tous les mots, il y a un mot inauthentique, c'est bien le mot
>'authentique'."--blanchot, lecrituredudesastre
>
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>

is ee y ou(')s ee... a be cuming s ent eign en : er/r eign *is* ?



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: