Re: ee (re: a d/a s(n)ein)an/n e x tra "m"...

At 09:28 AM 11/5/95 -0800, you wrote:
>At 11:23 AM 11/5/95 +0100, you wrote:
>>for give me if i repli cate
>> onetwothreefourfive pigeonsjustlikethat
>>i p/refer clear(blade)ing runs
>>to p oint(ment)ing self-se-rious digits
>>
>>ee called to me
>>"truth has become televisionary"
>>you see
>>
>>"If poetry were anything--like dropping an atombomb--which anyone did,
>>anyone could become a poet merely by doing the necessary anything; whatever
>>that anything might or might not entail. But (as it happens) poetry is
>>being, not doing. If you wish to follow, even at a distance, the poet's
>>calling (and here, as always, I speak from my own totally biased and
>>entirely personal point of view) you've got to come out of the measurable
>>doing universe into the immeasurable house of being."--eecummings,
>>i:sixnonlectures
>>
>>so whynot listen to-words speak us
>>in stead (butnot op posed) of
>>cal cul a ting
>>
>>musespeak, i can hearthem
>>
>>will no one a bandon
>>quest for dasein--erect arbor
>>?
>>
>>"Si, parmi tous les mots, il y a un mot inauthentique, c'est bien le mot
>>'authentique'."--blanchot, lecrituredudesastre
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>>
>>
>
>is ee y ou(')s ee... a be cuming s ent eign en : er/r eign *is* ?
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>

ee...err forge t he x tra "m"... sor re ee...



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: