Thanks Sara and Ian for replying my S-O-S!
Yes Sara, Taminiaux seems to be important reading. But he doesn't say very
much about Heidegger's explicit Hegel-texts. Ian, I agree with
you, Schmidt's book is really interesting, especially the part
that deals with 'Hegel's Begriff der Erfahrung'. I'm not sure,on the
other hand, if Schmidt succeeds in dealing with the time-proplematics. I
mean,if Heidegger is wrong in reading Hegel's conception of time from his
philosophy of nature, is it better to read "the conception of time
operative in Hegel's system" (Schmidt's words) from 'Herr und Knecht'.
That seems to be an overly Kojevean reading.
Anyway, Heidegger's reading of Ph{nomenologie des Geistes seems to be
mostly unexplored terrain. (Despite of that, in the hegelian circles
it causes mostly ridicule.) Anybody know anything written on it after
Schmidt's The Ubiquity-book and the Gandolpho-Lawry-debate on Southwestern
Phil Rev? Sara, or anybody else, if you'd be interested, I could try to
post the list of secondary-literature on Hegel/Heidegger I've been able to
found. Maybe you would be able to expand it.
your's
Heikki Ik{heimo
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---