>
>
>By "temporality" does H mean "motion": as in the
>periodic motion of physics (rotation of earth, solar orbit...
>the empirical basis of "time") ...atomic and Einsteinian
>physics where "physis=motion=time"?
Doubtful - temporality is an ontological consideration, and thus
deals with the groundwork from which human existentielle has the
possibility of experiencing something like the passing of existence.
As opposed to the purely ontic (empirico-scientific) or everyday
stand toward time as a measure of motion. You might say that one
is the possibility of the measure of emotion, the other some guess
as to the measure of motion.
>such that the issue becomes semantical: i.e. "being" is a
>verb which thru the perverse extrapolations of living language became
>a gerund and then a noun, which then (the way of all flesh)
> forgot where it came from...thence
>requiring "reduction/destruction/construction" to retrieve
>the authentic, verb, meaning?
>
Oh, puhleeze!
-------------------------------------
Micheal vanPelt,PhD
Chair, Humanities Division
Philander Smith College
Little Rock AR 72202 USA
Off: 501-370-5339; Res: 501-666-7199
E-mail: us005330@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author of PIRK -The Philosopher's Internet Resource Kit.
Note just a list of lists, but a complete (pretty much) guide to
philosophy resources on the Internet, including instructions on the
WorldWideWeb, WWW sites, FTP, Gopher, the software to use, and how-to's
on all of it.
Now available ftp from raz.mc.duke.edu/pub/PIRK.
11/13/95
Time: 10:09:29
This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---