Christopher, this is a bit cryptic to me.
Perhaps my question should have been, why peras and not apeiron? Why
limit, goal, and not boundlessness?
Simply aporetic! I cannot pass it.
rita
On Fri, 1 Dec 1995, Christopher Pound wrote:
> > Heidegger could have gotten at temporality via natality and creativity,
> > but does not. WHY? WHY DEATH AND DYING AS A FOCUS, AS MEANINGFUL?
>
> To put it even more briefly:
> Peras, not apeiron.
>
> Personally, I'm of two minds on this matter ... (!)
>
> --
> Christopher Pound (pound@xxxxxxxx)
> Dept. of Anthropology, Rice University
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---