On Tue, 19 Dec 1995 CPeebles@xxxxxxx wrote:
> On 12.18 Keith Meatto wrote:
> how is it that owning up to one's anxiety does not degenerate into what
> Hubert Dreyfus calls a secularized version of Kierkegaard's Religiousness
> A? not sure I agree with Dryfus' reading in the appendix to
> Being-in-the-world, yet I have not been able to find sufficient textual
> evidence in BT to offer
> an explanation of my own. realize this is a fairly basic question but
> would welcome any thoughts and recommendations. "
>
> A comment on religion rather than on anxiety:
> What about Heidegger's religion? I think that the question is worth pursuing.
> It would not be religion in Kierkegaard sense, but taking into account that
> Aletheia is a godess, Holderlin's influence, Nietzsche's influence, etc. etc.
> one could indeed try to speak of Heidegger's religion. Religion which is, as
> is also certain kind of ethics, all over Heidegger. Perhaps?
> PEtar Ramadanovic, Binghamton university
>
And if it is religion, how does Heidegger define responsibility to the
Other. Religiousness A seems to locate my responsibility in what
god tells me to do, seemingly mitigating or annulling my personal
responsibility to the Other...what does Heidegger have to say about
Religiousness B?
Hopkins
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> On 12.18 Keith Meatto wrote:
> how is it that owning up to one's anxiety does not degenerate into what
> Hubert Dreyfus calls a secularized version of Kierkegaard's Religiousness
> A? not sure I agree with Dryfus' reading in the appendix to
> Being-in-the-world, yet I have not been able to find sufficient textual
> evidence in BT to offer
> an explanation of my own. realize this is a fairly basic question but
> would welcome any thoughts and recommendations. "
>
> A comment on religion rather than on anxiety:
> What about Heidegger's religion? I think that the question is worth pursuing.
> It would not be religion in Kierkegaard sense, but taking into account that
> Aletheia is a godess, Holderlin's influence, Nietzsche's influence, etc. etc.
> one could indeed try to speak of Heidegger's religion. Religion which is, as
> is also certain kind of ethics, all over Heidegger. Perhaps?
> PEtar Ramadanovic, Binghamton university
>
And if it is religion, how does Heidegger define responsibility to the
Other. Religiousness A seems to locate my responsibility in what
god tells me to do, seemingly mitigating or annulling my personal
responsibility to the Other...what does Heidegger have to say about
Religiousness B?
Hopkins
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---