Really, I resent being cast as a fellow shooter in this odd thing. I think
my responses to Babich have been, on the contrary and in the main,
examples of non-shooting. Such "non-shooting" does not mean that one is
therefor not involved in something that has tension, aspects of conflict,
and so forth. What counts as shooting? I don't *want* to shoot, and
encouraged Babich not to engage in that practice in this discursive
setting.
If I say, as I did at the beginning of this post, "I resent", such and
such goes too far, etc., I think it is a mistake to regard this as an
example of shooting.
On Tue, 30 Jan 1996 CPeebles@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Let us not have a world or a list in which you cannot offend anybody.
> I write this as a person who may consider himself offended by Babich. (This
> kind of legitimizes my opinion on the matter?!?)
> Isn't being exposed a precondition for a community? Doesn't Heidegger speak
> of it rather than of self-sufficient, autonomous individual as somebody
> suggested?
> Shoot, Babich!
> Shoot, Blancato!
> Petar Ramadanovic
>
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---