Re:reply/ Apologies and more

To Brendan Harkin, Iain Thomson, The ever-overlong Tom Blancato,
and company. I am going to regret this: but are fellows aware
of your chronic moronicism? Try thinking. Your guy Heidegger
recommends it. But there's a catch: ya got to be able to do it.

Fuck your posts in response to my apology were stupid.

And, in light of that, I'm unsubscribing. Bitch back to the air
ifn' ya want. But try caffeine, speed, L-glutamine, Phosphatidyl
choline, anything to improve your thought capacity before you
start. Sheesh.

I'm still sorry but you guys will in the popular language that
appears to suit your level best always be stupid. There is no
cure and the afflicted are usually unaware of it.

Indeed, your brighter. more interesting comments on Heidegger
weren't about Heidegger at all. If your words on Heidegger
had been insightful or perspicuous to begin with, I'd not
have reacted with the disappointment that characterised my
earlier posts. But it was also a misjudgment on my part to
make such comments as I made. For given the level of my
interlocutors how ever could I expect other than I got.


On second thought, changing my mind here in mid aetherial-
ion-flux, I'll not unsubscribe. The cheap shots to follow
(all in defense, all shots, just as this post is a reply to
below the belt shots delivered by a gang of you against me
in the wake of an apology I foolishly offered to let
my disappointment-inspired invective trail off into nothingness.
Misjudgment on my part, natch, as the results show well
enough guys) should be bracing fun for anyone who likes
to confirm an already overconfirmed prejudice.

Wholan, go to it.

BB


--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Folow-ups
  • Re:reply/ Apologies and more
    • From: N. Antonucci
  • Replies
    Re:reply/ Apologies and more, Brendan Harkin
    Partial thread listing: