T-T

>To Brendan Harkin, Iain Thomson, The ever-overlong Tom Blancato,
>and company. I am going to regret this: but are fellows aware
>of your chronic moronicism? Try thinking. Your guy Heidegger
>recommends it. But there's a catch: ya got to be able to do it.
>
>Fuck your posts in response to my apology were stupid.
>
>And, in light of that, I'm unsubscribing. Bitch back to the air
>ifn' ya want. But try caffeine, speed, L-glutamine, Phosphatidyl
>choline, anything to improve your thought capacity before you
>start. Sheesh.
>
>I'm still sorry but you guys will in the popular language that
>appears to suit your level best always be stupid. There is no
>cure and the afflicted are usually unaware of it.
>
>Indeed, your brighter. more interesting comments on Heidegger
>weren't about Heidegger at all. If your words on Heidegger
>had been insightful or perspicuous to begin with, I'd not
>have reacted with the disappointment that characterised my
>earlier posts. But it was also a misjudgment on my part to
>make such comments as I made. For given the level of my
>interlocutors how ever could I expect other than I got.
>
>
>On second thought, changing my mind here in mid aetherial-
>ion-flux, I'll not unsubscribe. The cheap shots to follow
>(all in defense, all shots, just as this post is a reply to
>below the belt shots delivered by a gang of you against me
>in the wake of an apology I foolishly offered to let
>my disappointment-inspired invective trail off into nothingness.
>Misjudgment on my part, natch, as the results show well
>enough guys) should be bracing fun for anyone who likes
>to confirm an already overconfirmed prejudice.
>
>Wholan, go to it.
>
>BB
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>

ink
Th<
orazine



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: