Thanks for the he*lp. I find it gratifying that you stress the distinction
between Dasein and man, since I wanted to quote this passage precisely in
order to prove this very point.
Martin Weatherston,
Philosophy & Religious Studies Dept.,
East Stroudsburg University,
East Stroudsburg, PA 18301.
On Wed, 10 Apr 1996, James McFarland wrote:
> Man, therefore, cannot be equated with Da-sein, since the
> ontological level of description that identifies Da-sein is far beyond
> the level of local being within which the notion of man is formed.
>
> That's just my stab at it.
>
> James McFarland
> Dept. of German
> Princeton University
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
between Dasein and man, since I wanted to quote this passage precisely in
order to prove this very point.
Martin Weatherston,
Philosophy & Religious Studies Dept.,
East Stroudsburg University,
East Stroudsburg, PA 18301.
On Wed, 10 Apr 1996, James McFarland wrote:
> Man, therefore, cannot be equated with Da-sein, since the
> ontological level of description that identifies Da-sein is far beyond
> the level of local being within which the notion of man is formed.
>
> That's just my stab at it.
>
> James McFarland
> Dept. of German
> Princeton University
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---