Jud, we all know what you are doing since you declared
it plainly in a previous post, but why do you repeat
what you call "sicko" and filth? You multiply it and
spread it like a nasty virus. I did not like the
(insulting bits, not the main discussions) posts by
Ariosto (and, sorry, I am sure he is a man who must be
laughing quietly at your depiction of him as a woman)
and Kenneth, but you are exercising a dirty protest
instead of ignoring what you agree (don't you?) is not
worthy of this list. You made your hugely unsubtle
point. Now leave it alone if you do not want to become
king of the mountain of filth, a monarch of
questionable status, huh? If you insist upon building
your cess pit then you edge uncomfortably close to
trolling. Is that what you want? Have you ever
wondered why you, in particular, receive such abuse so
much? There have many, sometimes subtle, hints from
others. You seem to ignore such hints and then wonder
why you come under attack. Typical man ;-)
I for one do not want to be exposed to anyone's shit
and especially not yours (and it *is now yours* when
you gratuitously repeat it, OK).
cheers
Calypso
In a message dated 04/11/2004 21:01:12 GMT Standard
Time,
calypso_1001_2000@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Jud excretes this rubbish. What the hell is this
doing
on a philosophy discussion list?
<Tympan the "sensitive" pseud writes:
Its initial contribution 02.11.2004 to the philosophy
discussion list.
*At these times the only thing he seems good for is a
good fuck in the ass before he is thrown away like
garbage.*
Its latest contribution to contribution 04.11. 2004 to
the philosophy
discussion list:
*fuck off judy you clown.*
Jud:
Tympan excretes this rubbish. I am simply re-posting
Tympan's filth
juxtapositioned against the pseudo-crap that Tympan
has been writing to this
philosophy recently as a lesson and as a reminder as
to what the sicko mind behind
the mask is actually like.
They are Tympan's words not mine. Tympan is the one
bringing disgrace to the
list not me. I have never used foul language
in all my years on this list, and YOU ARE TOO, with
your preposterous
disregard and lack of disapprobation as to the
perpetrators, and condemnation of
the victim. Anyway, why so highly selective in your
feigned outrage? Where was
your feigned outrage when SHE posted her filth to the
list?
Where was your feigned outrage when the demented
alcoholic posted HIS filth
to the list?
I have never taken outrageous blaspheming-type ad
hominem sitting down in
the past, and I have no intention of starting now.
Jud
=====
"men are something that must be overcome" [apo-calypso]
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
it plainly in a previous post, but why do you repeat
what you call "sicko" and filth? You multiply it and
spread it like a nasty virus. I did not like the
(insulting bits, not the main discussions) posts by
Ariosto (and, sorry, I am sure he is a man who must be
laughing quietly at your depiction of him as a woman)
and Kenneth, but you are exercising a dirty protest
instead of ignoring what you agree (don't you?) is not
worthy of this list. You made your hugely unsubtle
point. Now leave it alone if you do not want to become
king of the mountain of filth, a monarch of
questionable status, huh? If you insist upon building
your cess pit then you edge uncomfortably close to
trolling. Is that what you want? Have you ever
wondered why you, in particular, receive such abuse so
much? There have many, sometimes subtle, hints from
others. You seem to ignore such hints and then wonder
why you come under attack. Typical man ;-)
I for one do not want to be exposed to anyone's shit
and especially not yours (and it *is now yours* when
you gratuitously repeat it, OK).
cheers
Calypso
In a message dated 04/11/2004 21:01:12 GMT Standard
Time,
calypso_1001_2000@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Jud excretes this rubbish. What the hell is this
doing
on a philosophy discussion list?
<Tympan the "sensitive" pseud writes:
Its initial contribution 02.11.2004 to the philosophy
discussion list.
*At these times the only thing he seems good for is a
good fuck in the ass before he is thrown away like
garbage.*
Its latest contribution to contribution 04.11. 2004 to
the philosophy
discussion list:
*fuck off judy you clown.*
Jud:
Tympan excretes this rubbish. I am simply re-posting
Tympan's filth
juxtapositioned against the pseudo-crap that Tympan
has been writing to this
philosophy recently as a lesson and as a reminder as
to what the sicko mind behind
the mask is actually like.
They are Tympan's words not mine. Tympan is the one
bringing disgrace to the
list not me. I have never used foul language
in all my years on this list, and YOU ARE TOO, with
your preposterous
disregard and lack of disapprobation as to the
perpetrators, and condemnation of
the victim. Anyway, why so highly selective in your
feigned outrage? Where was
your feigned outrage when SHE posted her filth to the
list?
Where was your feigned outrage when the demented
alcoholic posted HIS filth
to the list?
I have never taken outrageous blaspheming-type ad
hominem sitting down in
the past, and I have no intention of starting now.
Jud
=====
"men are something that must be overcome" [apo-calypso]
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---