Chris,
In what sense are you saying that Heidegger thought Ereignis is
unnecessary? In the sense that it is not necessary that there be
being rather than nothing (that intelligibility is a historically
contingent fact), or in some stronger sense?
I find this an intriguing but problematic suggestion. Could you
elaborate? Thanks,
Iain Thomson
UCSD Philo.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
In what sense are you saying that Heidegger thought Ereignis is
unnecessary? In the sense that it is not necessary that there be
being rather than nothing (that intelligibility is a historically
contingent fact), or in some stronger sense?
I find this an intriguing but problematic suggestion. Could you
elaborate? Thanks,
Iain Thomson
UCSD Philo.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------