Re: heidegger and the babes

i think that's very interesting. i really don't know that one's using such
terms means that one 'can't be serious'. I'm really not sure of that at all.
Indeed, it may be that entrance into questions concerning sexuality/sex in or
not in heidegger might have to accomplish themselves with a little disruption.
Depending. But one must maintain oneself according to the possibility of
violence.



Robert J. Shea writes:
>You wrote:
>>
>>that helps a little. maybe i should give a little more information:
>>i'm working on heidegger's 'thought' on technology and in so doing
>>i began to wonder about his 'thought' on fucking. i know he tries
>>to avoid it, but i wonder if there has been anything doen on his
>>philosophy of fucking, not just pussy, but anuses and such too. any
>>mention of sade in heidegger?
>>
>>chris
>>
>>
>> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>>
>Get off the list, dude. You can't be serious about any such study when
>you use such terms. Yes, I'm pre-judging you.
>Robert
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

---
There is no path to peace. Peace is the path.

Tom Blancato
tblancato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eyes on Violence (nonviolence and human rights monitoring in Haiti)
Thoughtaction Collective (reparative justice project)




--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

------------------

Partial thread listing: