Was any consensus reached as to the question of the possibility
of transitions between inauthenticity and authenticity? It seems
to me that if Dasein is authentic, is able to take on its guilt for
its own, be equal to the situation, listening to the call, mindful
of its death - then although various factors could intervene, it
would require a forgetting to succumb to (Verfallen) temptation,
one-sidedness, indifference, curiosity, equivocation etc. And
conversely, the possibility of returning would necessarily
require a recollection of what one is, can be, has been. The
question of the way in which this transition might be made - which
should be part of the descrip[tion of the antithesis - could
be approached from the angle of the Krisis theme, which is laid
out in Husserl and Heidegger in a recent book by R> Philip Buckley
on philosophical responsibility in these two phenomenologists
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
of transitions between inauthenticity and authenticity? It seems
to me that if Dasein is authentic, is able to take on its guilt for
its own, be equal to the situation, listening to the call, mindful
of its death - then although various factors could intervene, it
would require a forgetting to succumb to (Verfallen) temptation,
one-sidedness, indifference, curiosity, equivocation etc. And
conversely, the possibility of returning would necessarily
require a recollection of what one is, can be, has been. The
question of the way in which this transition might be made - which
should be part of the descrip[tion of the antithesis - could
be approached from the angle of the Krisis theme, which is laid
out in Husserl and Heidegger in a recent book by R> Philip Buckley
on philosophical responsibility in these two phenomenologists
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------