I share the interest David Schenk has expressed in the early Heidegger. It
seems to me that Heidegger usually has Husserl in the back of his mind during
this period, working both against and with him. This is almost certainly
true in regard to temporality, given Heidegger's role in editing Husserl's
early lectures on internal time-consciousness, published in 1928.
Although I don't know as much about his writings on temporality as I would
like to, I have the sense that Heidegger is trying to set up a contrast
between the noetic temporality studied by Husserl, and the more primordial,
pre-theoretical form of temporality which Heidegger describes as "the
ontological meaning of care." The futural orientation of Dasein seems to be
an important step here. Eventually, he wants to show that Husserlian
intentionality is derived from or founded on this deeper form of temporality
(see note in BT Sec 69b).
I look forward to future posts on this subject.
-- Phil Miller
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
seems to me that Heidegger usually has Husserl in the back of his mind during
this period, working both against and with him. This is almost certainly
true in regard to temporality, given Heidegger's role in editing Husserl's
early lectures on internal time-consciousness, published in 1928.
Although I don't know as much about his writings on temporality as I would
like to, I have the sense that Heidegger is trying to set up a contrast
between the noetic temporality studied by Husserl, and the more primordial,
pre-theoretical form of temporality which Heidegger describes as "the
ontological meaning of care." The futural orientation of Dasein seems to be
an important step here. Eventually, he wants to show that Husserlian
intentionality is derived from or founded on this deeper form of temporality
(see note in BT Sec 69b).
I look forward to future posts on this subject.
-- Phil Miller
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------