On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Anthony J Dominioni wrote:
> To all;
> I think that, as language is such a bridge to cross in study of
> Heidegger, that we should be careful to avoid doubletalk between Being
> and being, perhaps we could use *essent* for 'being', as the essent has
> essence, though Dasein has Being. Power of the wyrd is incalculable.
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
Yes,
Concerning Mr. Dominioni's brief remarks, I agree that "power of the
weird (sic) (or did you mean "wired") is incalculable"...though I do not
think Heidegger would say it in those words.
Bart
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
> To all;
> I think that, as language is such a bridge to cross in study of
> Heidegger, that we should be careful to avoid doubletalk between Being
> and being, perhaps we could use *essent* for 'being', as the essent has
> essence, though Dasein has Being. Power of the wyrd is incalculable.
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
Yes,
Concerning Mr. Dominioni's brief remarks, I agree that "power of the
weird (sic) (or did you mean "wired") is incalculable"...though I do not
think Heidegger would say it in those words.
Bart
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------