Re: Caring-for, and Dasein

> Michael Harrawood wrote:
>
> >This would be a way of starting to answer the question of how Dasein is
> >different from being, and also why Heidegger thinks animals are not, or
> >do not possess Dasein. He uses the expression "world poor" (in History
> >of the Concept of Time and Basic Problems) describing animals because
> >they haven't got the founding principle of Worldhood, which is precisely
> >that possibility of knowing themselves reflectively, so as to have their
> >being at issue for them: this, Heidegger will later say is the foundation
> >of human consciousness, language, etc.

Just something of a question. I thought he always referred to animals
and rocks and "worldless" and only in GA 29/30 refers to them as
"world-poor." A reference to the contrary would be appreciated.

Chris


--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

------------------

Partial thread listing: