Dear
[ ] sir [ ] clueless one [x] twit [ ] professional student
[ ] madam [ ] dweeb [ ] twerp [ ] comrade
[ ] Elvis [ ] (cyber)punk [ ] boor [ ] Obergruppenfuehrer
[ ] peasant [ ] Geek [ ] grad student [ ] train spotting anorak
You are being greatly flamed because:
[ ] you continued a boring useless stupid thread
[ ] you repeatedly posted to the same thread that you just posted to
[ ] you repeatedly posted incoherent, flaky, and mindless posts
[ ] you frightened the horses
[ ] you advocated Net censorship
[ ] you SCREAMED! (used all caps)
[ ] you posted some sort of junk that doesn't belong in this group
[ ] you got your Gesamtausgabe volume references wrong
[ ] you posted your UNSUB message to the list instead of the LISTSERV
[ ] you threatened to deconstruct a list member
[ ] you made (a) bigoted statement(s)
[ ] you repeatedly assumed unwarranted moral or intellectual superiority
[ ] you are under the misapprehension that this group is your preserve
[ ] you repeatedly showed lack of humor
[ ] you are totally ontic
[ ] you are apparently under compulsion to post to every thread
[x] you are posting an anonymous attack
[ ] you foolishly attached a file to the entire list!!!
[x] you used sarcasm without inflection
[ ] you are lost in metaphysics
[ ] you used PoMo obfuscation
[ ] your command of German/Greek/Latin is unworthy
[ ] you started the 'was he a Nazi?' thread again
[ ] you are a logico-positivist with no grasp of ontology
Thank you for the time you have taken to read this. Feel free to
reuse this post.
Thank you,
Pete
paf@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.webcom.com/~paf/pete.html
> From owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thu Sep 28 16:52:43 1995
> To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Heidegger & Marx
> Sender: owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Frederik van Gelder writes:
>
> This is such nonsense that it's not easy to know whether to pass it by in
> silence or whether such silence does'nt make one guilty of a lack of
> opposition to obscurantism.
>
>
>
> Frederik van Gelder Ph.D.
> Institut fuer Sozialforschung
> Frankfurt University
> (Yes, the 'old' Frankfurt School)
>
> Gelder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Just wanted to use this break in the OJ trial to fire off
> a thank-you for your thoughtful response. I know how
> harried grad life can be...when my cousin Marvin
> got his MBA...oops...so I deeply appreciate
> your liberality as well as your brilliant adversion.
>
> No doubt you've preserved me from a devastating
> embarrassment, for which I am still more grateful as not all intellectuals
> are as innocent of professional ego as yourself and
> would not exploit the opportunity for the advancement of learning.
> I can say with utmost security I am incalculably more
> enlightened on the Q re the etiology of H's ideology
> now I have your response.
>
> As for your acute sensitivity to oppose obscurantism
> (albeit re yours truly) it is...well...
> flat out philanthropic...a credit to the
> tradition of humanist scholarship...to your college...
> your race...my bosom swells...
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
[ ] sir [ ] clueless one [x] twit [ ] professional student
[ ] madam [ ] dweeb [ ] twerp [ ] comrade
[ ] Elvis [ ] (cyber)punk [ ] boor [ ] Obergruppenfuehrer
[ ] peasant [ ] Geek [ ] grad student [ ] train spotting anorak
You are being greatly flamed because:
[ ] you continued a boring useless stupid thread
[ ] you repeatedly posted to the same thread that you just posted to
[ ] you repeatedly posted incoherent, flaky, and mindless posts
[ ] you frightened the horses
[ ] you advocated Net censorship
[ ] you SCREAMED! (used all caps)
[ ] you posted some sort of junk that doesn't belong in this group
[ ] you got your Gesamtausgabe volume references wrong
[ ] you posted your UNSUB message to the list instead of the LISTSERV
[ ] you threatened to deconstruct a list member
[ ] you made (a) bigoted statement(s)
[ ] you repeatedly assumed unwarranted moral or intellectual superiority
[ ] you are under the misapprehension that this group is your preserve
[ ] you repeatedly showed lack of humor
[ ] you are totally ontic
[ ] you are apparently under compulsion to post to every thread
[x] you are posting an anonymous attack
[ ] you foolishly attached a file to the entire list!!!
[x] you used sarcasm without inflection
[ ] you are lost in metaphysics
[ ] you used PoMo obfuscation
[ ] your command of German/Greek/Latin is unworthy
[ ] you started the 'was he a Nazi?' thread again
[ ] you are a logico-positivist with no grasp of ontology
Thank you for the time you have taken to read this. Feel free to
reuse this post.
Thank you,
Pete
paf@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.webcom.com/~paf/pete.html
> From owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thu Sep 28 16:52:43 1995
> To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Heidegger & Marx
> Sender: owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Frederik van Gelder writes:
>
> This is such nonsense that it's not easy to know whether to pass it by in
> silence or whether such silence does'nt make one guilty of a lack of
> opposition to obscurantism.
>
>
>
> Frederik van Gelder Ph.D.
> Institut fuer Sozialforschung
> Frankfurt University
> (Yes, the 'old' Frankfurt School)
>
> Gelder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Just wanted to use this break in the OJ trial to fire off
> a thank-you for your thoughtful response. I know how
> harried grad life can be...when my cousin Marvin
> got his MBA...oops...so I deeply appreciate
> your liberality as well as your brilliant adversion.
>
> No doubt you've preserved me from a devastating
> embarrassment, for which I am still more grateful as not all intellectuals
> are as innocent of professional ego as yourself and
> would not exploit the opportunity for the advancement of learning.
> I can say with utmost security I am incalculably more
> enlightened on the Q re the etiology of H's ideology
> now I have your response.
>
> As for your acute sensitivity to oppose obscurantism
> (albeit re yours truly) it is...well...
> flat out philanthropic...a credit to the
> tradition of humanist scholarship...to your college...
> your race...my bosom swells...
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------