[mpisgmedia] DMP2021 feedback eml-id: over quota!!!

p'haps stpi which will be doing the "comprehensive
computerisation on path to e-governance" for which dda
budget for the year has earmarked 12 cr could sort out
this little problem!


--- Internet Mail Delivery <postmaster@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:53:56 +0530 (IST)
> From: Internet Mail Delivery <postmaster@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
> To: mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx
>
> This report relates to a message you sent with the
> following header fields:
>
> Return-path: <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Received: from ims-ms-daemon.vmail.vsnl.com by
> vmail.vsnl.com
> (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built
> May 14 2003))
> id <0IF900F116VVPC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (original mail
> from mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx)
> ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:53:56 +0530 (IST)
> Received: from web53807.mail.yahoo.com
> ([203.199.113.69])
> by vmail.vsnl.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2
> HotFix 1.16 (built May 14
> 2003)) with SMTP id
> <0IF90089R6VOYU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,
> 20 Apr 2005 21:53:51 +0530 (IST)
> Received: (qmail 12774 invoked by uid 60001); Wed,
> 20 Apr 2005 16:23:47 +0000
> Received: from [202.89.67.66] by
> web53807.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed,
> 20 Apr 2005 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Request for public debate with DMP2021
> sub-group ... wrt High Court
> order in WP 6980/2002
> To: pccumsectry@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-id:
> <20050420162347.12772.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
> Comment: DomainKeys? See
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
>
>
b=vMv/s0+WJq89EdDFe7d8iDKVqCMhZHGa/WfwuyOhZK+9vl4xpxHIt7nK7ky1pwHqKDnJ11cNHmP0zJ759X0t9bYSUv4T3hC4YFexxEonV+DA8bejLK2ybMVljsaUu7ivAqgO/4RVssb232BDRtIcGYFdkjxNKIwNZNS8nMAlRqY=
> ;
>
> Your message cannot be delivered to the following
> recipients:
>
> Recipient address:
> administrator%ddadelhi.com@ims-ms-daemon
> Original address: pccumsectry@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reason: Over quota
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com Return-path: <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
Received: from ims-ms-daemon.vmail.vsnl.com by vmail.vsnl.com
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003))
id <0IF900F116VVPC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (original mail from mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx)
; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:53:56 +0530 (IST)
Received: from web53807.mail.yahoo.com ([203.199.113.69])
by vmail.vsnl.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14
2003)) with SMTP id <0IF90089R6VOYU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed,
20 Apr 2005 21:53:51 +0530 (IST)
Received: (qmail 12774 invoked by uid 60001); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:23:47 +0000
Received: from [202.89.67.66] by web53807.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed,
20 Apr 2005 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Request for public debate with DMP2021 sub-group ... wrt High Court
order in WP 6980/2002
To: pccumsectry@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <20050420162347.12772.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
b=vMv/s0+WJq89EdDFe7d8iDKVqCMhZHGa/WfwuyOhZK+9vl4xpxHIt7nK7ky1pwHqKDnJ11cNHmP0zJ759X0t9bYSUv4T3hC4YFexxEonV+DA8bejLK2ybMVljsaUu7ivAqgO/4RVssb232BDRtIcGYFdkjxNKIwNZNS8nMAlRqY= ;


Partial thread listing: