--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is tactically not a good petition to intervene
> in
> and DMP issues will probably be sidelined.
----
sarabjit,
DMP case is already *won* in MPISG PIL! order of
27/10/04 also supports NHP-CSS in Edu Bill; and MPISG
s.11A response is technically sufficient to prevent
abandoning DMP2001 NHP-CSS via DMP2021. further court
orders upholding DMP / NHP-CSS are not necessary
unless there is s.11A violation.
We could have filed for further directions for
compliance of order of 27/10/04 (like SJ has for
compliance of order of 20/01/04); but non-compliance
problem we are facing is due to circus on purported
compliance on order of 20/01/04. so we filed, to
connect, an intervention when schools moved. and i
filed one when SJ moved. the idea is to keep the DMP
solution afloat and for that this is THE case to
intervene in.
btw,
TMAPai judgment & dsae nicely fit to DMP approach &
gnctd has already 'control', with responsibilities,
over land (under DD act). prospects of endearing
myself to cliques pressing these out of context of
holistic solutions are non-existent and i await now
nobody-gita-is-anti-poor-kids buzz from them :)
---------
aruna, this also connects to mixed landuse. dmp2021
proposes nursery schools in residential plots and
other things to legitimize misuse of nursery school
plots.
---------
all else apart, the claim that making a song and dance
about somehow enforcing on 294 schools a free-seats
quota amounts to integrated education for the poor or
common-school-system carries the assumption that the
city is full of morons who dont give a damn about
education. i find the assumption insulting.
---------
i would appreciate a view on the line of argument,
especially the free-seats approach being
counter-productive and contrary to order of 20/01/04
itself besides to order of 27/10/04.
http://plan.architexturez.net/site/mpisg/f/050823
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
> This is tactically not a good petition to intervene
> in
> and DMP issues will probably be sidelined.
----
sarabjit,
DMP case is already *won* in MPISG PIL! order of
27/10/04 also supports NHP-CSS in Edu Bill; and MPISG
s.11A response is technically sufficient to prevent
abandoning DMP2001 NHP-CSS via DMP2021. further court
orders upholding DMP / NHP-CSS are not necessary
unless there is s.11A violation.
We could have filed for further directions for
compliance of order of 27/10/04 (like SJ has for
compliance of order of 20/01/04); but non-compliance
problem we are facing is due to circus on purported
compliance on order of 20/01/04. so we filed, to
connect, an intervention when schools moved. and i
filed one when SJ moved. the idea is to keep the DMP
solution afloat and for that this is THE case to
intervene in.
btw,
TMAPai judgment & dsae nicely fit to DMP approach &
gnctd has already 'control', with responsibilities,
over land (under DD act). prospects of endearing
myself to cliques pressing these out of context of
holistic solutions are non-existent and i await now
nobody-gita-is-anti-poor-kids buzz from them :)
---------
aruna, this also connects to mixed landuse. dmp2021
proposes nursery schools in residential plots and
other things to legitimize misuse of nursery school
plots.
---------
all else apart, the claim that making a song and dance
about somehow enforcing on 294 schools a free-seats
quota amounts to integrated education for the poor or
common-school-system carries the assumption that the
city is full of morons who dont give a damn about
education. i find the assumption insulting.
---------
i would appreciate a view on the line of argument,
especially the free-seats approach being
counter-productive and contrary to order of 20/01/04
itself besides to order of 27/10/04.
http://plan.architexturez.net/site/mpisg/f/050823
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com