poonam thnx for the loose-talk by Anuj Dayal at ITPI
http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/mpisgmedia/2005-August/000482.html
I adore the pride in punctuality by forging forth
without-waiting-for-approvals, refusing to show tender
details to UoI, etc, and the no-budget for low-cost
publicity & advertising and lunches-dinners-n-gifts
for journos.
was bragging about hundreds-of-litigations-n-no-stay a
statistic on Power-Point? I could make smug-planner
demand for errata! and maybe RTI application for
statistic re fees to senior counsel for winning (and
in case of the attempt to get court order for other
encroachment removal at shastri park, not-winning)
more fun: Project Tiger has NOT cleared metroPD!
letter from interested investor to MoEF Secy re PPP
guidelines has returned reply from Project T saying
no-comment re Amusement tender. this is relevant since
clearances claimed by DMRC are irrelevant :)
Meanwhile:
Kerala cabinet has cleared yesterday DMRC proposal for
Kochi metro on BOT
http://www.hindu.com/2005/09/01/stories/2005090109200100.htm
and
GoM has cleared cleared phase II of Delhi metro
http://www.hindu.com/2005/09/01/stories/2005090111770400.htm
(mildly noted is qutb elevated-corridor fuss-making
by, among other eminences, KT Ravindran, who was on
environment sub-group + general adviser for DMP2021;
also Project Tiger is now task-forced under Sunita
Narain who chaired DMP2021 environment sub-group. this
is relevant, as DMP2021 land use plan has IT Park on
riverbed colored bright red).
--- on 29/08/01
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My case against metro property development came up
> before Justice Nandrajog yesterday and has been
> listed
> for 19/10/05. The stay against DMRC tender for
> so-called temporary Amusement Park on 15 + 2.7 Ha on
> the riverbed on extendable 15-year license is also
> extended till then.
>
> Meanwhile, Ahmedabad metro by 2010, on Delhi lines:
>
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=146125
> "THE State Government, which will in a month start
> the
> procedure for buying land for the Ahmedabad Metro
> Rail
> project, is currently working on finances for the
> project ... ...To be completed in two phases, the
> first phase is expected to be operational by 2010,
> while the second phase would be operational by 2035.
> The Ahmedabad Metro Rail, which has been designed on
> the lines of Delhi Metro Rail Project, is to be
> developed at an estimated cost of Rs 3,200 crores.
> The
> Delhi Rail Metro Corporation has submitted two
> project
> reports to the state government"
>
>
>
> --- on 26/08/05
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I have a reply from MoEF to copy of my letters
> about
> > clearances claimed by DMRC in its
> counter-affidavit.
> > The proposals for metroPD on the riverbed were not
> > submitted for clearance.
> > ----
> >
> > the hindu had a report on 25/08 saying kerala
> > cabinet
> > has cleared the kochi metro (on delhi pattern)
> >
>
http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/25/stories/2005082514280100.htm
> > ----
> >
> >
> > --- on 25/08/05
> > --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > > We have filed yesterday the rejoinder in my case
> > > against metro property development. It is posted
> > > after
> > > the petition and the two applications at:
> > > http://plan.architexturez.net/site/mpisg/p/metro
> > > Makes, on affidavit now, the case that our
> > > world-class-role-model is template not just for
> > > world-class metro, but also for riding on it a
> > > third-class metroPD scam.
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Anyone knows if Kerala cabinet approved on
> > Wednesday
> > > the Delhi-metro-model? (I find its pace
> > astounding.
> > > Monday a high-level meeting discusses a
> photo-copy
> > > *funding-plan* for metro-by-2010 and schedules
> > > cabinet
> > > approval on Wednesday, clearances by October 31,
> > > start
> > > of facilitating-law-making...) The next one in
> the
> > > race to 2010, we can assume, will be quicker
> > still.
> > > We
> > > will surely be world-class by 2010 at this rate
> > > (what
> > > in is anyway fuzzy claim).
> > >
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/mpisgmedia/2005-August/000482.html
I adore the pride in punctuality by forging forth
without-waiting-for-approvals, refusing to show tender
details to UoI, etc, and the no-budget for low-cost
publicity & advertising and lunches-dinners-n-gifts
for journos.
was bragging about hundreds-of-litigations-n-no-stay a
statistic on Power-Point? I could make smug-planner
demand for errata! and maybe RTI application for
statistic re fees to senior counsel for winning (and
in case of the attempt to get court order for other
encroachment removal at shastri park, not-winning)
more fun: Project Tiger has NOT cleared metroPD!
letter from interested investor to MoEF Secy re PPP
guidelines has returned reply from Project T saying
no-comment re Amusement tender. this is relevant since
clearances claimed by DMRC are irrelevant :)
Meanwhile:
Kerala cabinet has cleared yesterday DMRC proposal for
Kochi metro on BOT
http://www.hindu.com/2005/09/01/stories/2005090109200100.htm
and
GoM has cleared cleared phase II of Delhi metro
http://www.hindu.com/2005/09/01/stories/2005090111770400.htm
(mildly noted is qutb elevated-corridor fuss-making
by, among other eminences, KT Ravindran, who was on
environment sub-group + general adviser for DMP2021;
also Project Tiger is now task-forced under Sunita
Narain who chaired DMP2021 environment sub-group. this
is relevant, as DMP2021 land use plan has IT Park on
riverbed colored bright red).
--- on 29/08/01
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My case against metro property development came up
> before Justice Nandrajog yesterday and has been
> listed
> for 19/10/05. The stay against DMRC tender for
> so-called temporary Amusement Park on 15 + 2.7 Ha on
> the riverbed on extendable 15-year license is also
> extended till then.
>
> Meanwhile, Ahmedabad metro by 2010, on Delhi lines:
>
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=146125
> "THE State Government, which will in a month start
> the
> procedure for buying land for the Ahmedabad Metro
> Rail
> project, is currently working on finances for the
> project ... ...To be completed in two phases, the
> first phase is expected to be operational by 2010,
> while the second phase would be operational by 2035.
> The Ahmedabad Metro Rail, which has been designed on
> the lines of Delhi Metro Rail Project, is to be
> developed at an estimated cost of Rs 3,200 crores.
> The
> Delhi Rail Metro Corporation has submitted two
> project
> reports to the state government"
>
>
>
> --- on 26/08/05
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I have a reply from MoEF to copy of my letters
> about
> > clearances claimed by DMRC in its
> counter-affidavit.
> > The proposals for metroPD on the riverbed were not
> > submitted for clearance.
> > ----
> >
> > the hindu had a report on 25/08 saying kerala
> > cabinet
> > has cleared the kochi metro (on delhi pattern)
> >
>
http://www.hindu.com/2005/08/25/stories/2005082514280100.htm
> > ----
> >
> >
> > --- on 25/08/05
> > --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > > We have filed yesterday the rejoinder in my case
> > > against metro property development. It is posted
> > > after
> > > the petition and the two applications at:
> > > http://plan.architexturez.net/site/mpisg/p/metro
> > > Makes, on affidavit now, the case that our
> > > world-class-role-model is template not just for
> > > world-class metro, but also for riding on it a
> > > third-class metroPD scam.
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Anyone knows if Kerala cabinet approved on
> > Wednesday
> > > the Delhi-metro-model? (I find its pace
> > astounding.
> > > Monday a high-level meeting discusses a
> photo-copy
> > > *funding-plan* for metro-by-2010 and schedules
> > > cabinet
> > > approval on Wednesday, clearances by October 31,
> > > start
> > > of facilitating-law-making...) The next one in
> the
> > > race to 2010, we can assume, will be quicker
> > still.
> > > We
> > > will surely be world-class by 2010 at this rate
> > > (what
> > > in is anyway fuzzy claim).
> > >
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com