problem with secy MUD affidavit (and the Court
matters) is the view of the river in terms of
pollution, not water even as riverbed is also CGWA
protected ground water reserve (duly noted in NCR
Plan). DJB quotes relate to YAP and STPs (pollution,
not water). ridge shenanigans differ in that the CGWA
notification is for depletion. (btw, GNCTD livery is
coming up illegally in pendency of PIL in which GNCTD
has not replied but DDA has filed documents that prove
illegality).
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Didn't have time to reply to DMP environment /
> infrastructure. However my NCR Plan had some
> rejoinders on lack of Bijli / Paani / Roads etc.
> What
> on earth has happened to the NCR Plan? Has it
> suddenly
> become too controversial and anti DMP? Note the
> amusing cartwheels the clowns (Shielaji and Waliaji)
> are doing on water nowadays - Sonia Vihar will come
> -
> no it wont - yes it will .. in 2006 - recycle now -
> drink your sewage - so what if vasant kunj has no
> water, we'll truck it in from faridabad so that you
> can have all those wonderful malls next door- dont
> worry about the water used to make the malls we're
> trucking the concrete in from Gurgaon in these
> monster
> rotating machines which block the only access road
> of
> Mahipalpur which in any case is banned 24 hours from
> these monsters but the DCP Traffic (WE dont have
> Police under us) is too corrupt to care to implement
> his own orders becoz shielaji's govt is building her
> own liver institute on the road to treat the varied
> cirhossises of arab sheiks who are prohibited from
> drinking.
>
> Cud rant on some more, but its not worth it.
>
> Dont get mad - get even !!
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > --- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > (in ml in 'rules of data collection for your
> study')
> >
> > > BTW: Was out of town for a few days, how come
> > > there's
> > > nothing here about SC DMP remarks and SC Save
> > Yamuna
> > > Plan? Or do the have the clowns have to learn
> new
> > > jokes?
> >
> > --------
> >
> > by all reported accounts, the affidavit filed by
> > Secy
> > MUD is indifferent to statutory DMP obligations,
> > court
> > proceedings in related matters, etc. and this
> round
> > is
> > in name not of Yamuna but Thames (news reports of
> > Thames-like-Yamuna, in terms only of good ole
> STPs,
> > came same day as those of the party thrown by
> Indian
> > PM for Brit PM, at Humayun's Tomb). i find
> > DJB-bashing
> > in MUD affidavit and DJB quotes in media amusing.
> >
> > re DMP reference in the matter, has anyone
> > respondend
> > on environment and infrastructure chapters of
> > DMP2021?
> > (mpisg responses refer to the SC matter as the
> > yamuna
> > committee under Secy MUD was appointed last year
> and
> > its recos were in an anex in DMP2021; we suggested
> > their deletion on several grounds; same apply to
> > rest
> > of what has been reported about the affidavit)
> >
> > ---
> > btw, re DMP2021 objections and suggestions, new
> dda
> > vc
> > has been quoted about his plans to 'arrange
> > interactive workshops with stakeholders to discuss
> > these'. (the way i see it, DMP debate is trapped
> in
> > anti-plan 'stakeholder' disourse and unless
> rescued
> > by
> > institutions of urban professions or
> > anti-imperialist
> > politics, there is only one way DMP can go - down)
> > ---
> >
> > the coinsident Yamuna-Thames remark and Indo-Brit
> > Prime Ministerial at Humayun's Tomb bother me for
> > non-DMP reasons. The Indian Rebellion of 1857
> truly
> > began with the taking of Delhi after rebels from
> > Meerut arrived over the bridge-of-boats on Yamuna
> on
> > May 11. The re-taking, in September, ended with
> > capture of Bahadurshah Zafar and his sons and
> > grandson
> > from Humayun's Tomb. The princes were summarily
> > executed.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
matters) is the view of the river in terms of
pollution, not water even as riverbed is also CGWA
protected ground water reserve (duly noted in NCR
Plan). DJB quotes relate to YAP and STPs (pollution,
not water). ridge shenanigans differ in that the CGWA
notification is for depletion. (btw, GNCTD livery is
coming up illegally in pendency of PIL in which GNCTD
has not replied but DDA has filed documents that prove
illegality).
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Didn't have time to reply to DMP environment /
> infrastructure. However my NCR Plan had some
> rejoinders on lack of Bijli / Paani / Roads etc.
> What
> on earth has happened to the NCR Plan? Has it
> suddenly
> become too controversial and anti DMP? Note the
> amusing cartwheels the clowns (Shielaji and Waliaji)
> are doing on water nowadays - Sonia Vihar will come
> -
> no it wont - yes it will .. in 2006 - recycle now -
> drink your sewage - so what if vasant kunj has no
> water, we'll truck it in from faridabad so that you
> can have all those wonderful malls next door- dont
> worry about the water used to make the malls we're
> trucking the concrete in from Gurgaon in these
> monster
> rotating machines which block the only access road
> of
> Mahipalpur which in any case is banned 24 hours from
> these monsters but the DCP Traffic (WE dont have
> Police under us) is too corrupt to care to implement
> his own orders becoz shielaji's govt is building her
> own liver institute on the road to treat the varied
> cirhossises of arab sheiks who are prohibited from
> drinking.
>
> Cud rant on some more, but its not worth it.
>
> Dont get mad - get even !!
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > --- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > (in ml in 'rules of data collection for your
> study')
> >
> > > BTW: Was out of town for a few days, how come
> > > there's
> > > nothing here about SC DMP remarks and SC Save
> > Yamuna
> > > Plan? Or do the have the clowns have to learn
> new
> > > jokes?
> >
> > --------
> >
> > by all reported accounts, the affidavit filed by
> > Secy
> > MUD is indifferent to statutory DMP obligations,
> > court
> > proceedings in related matters, etc. and this
> round
> > is
> > in name not of Yamuna but Thames (news reports of
> > Thames-like-Yamuna, in terms only of good ole
> STPs,
> > came same day as those of the party thrown by
> Indian
> > PM for Brit PM, at Humayun's Tomb). i find
> > DJB-bashing
> > in MUD affidavit and DJB quotes in media amusing.
> >
> > re DMP reference in the matter, has anyone
> > respondend
> > on environment and infrastructure chapters of
> > DMP2021?
> > (mpisg responses refer to the SC matter as the
> > yamuna
> > committee under Secy MUD was appointed last year
> and
> > its recos were in an anex in DMP2021; we suggested
> > their deletion on several grounds; same apply to
> > rest
> > of what has been reported about the affidavit)
> >
> > ---
> > btw, re DMP2021 objections and suggestions, new
> dda
> > vc
> > has been quoted about his plans to 'arrange
> > interactive workshops with stakeholders to discuss
> > these'. (the way i see it, DMP debate is trapped
> in
> > anti-plan 'stakeholder' disourse and unless
> rescued
> > by
> > institutions of urban professions or
> > anti-imperialist
> > politics, there is only one way DMP can go - down)
> > ---
> >
> > the coinsident Yamuna-Thames remark and Indo-Brit
> > Prime Ministerial at Humayun's Tomb bother me for
> > non-DMP reasons. The Indian Rebellion of 1857
> truly
> > began with the taking of Delhi after rebels from
> > Meerut arrived over the bridge-of-boats on Yamuna
> on
> > May 11. The re-taking, in September, ended with
> > capture of Bahadurshah Zafar and his sons and
> > grandson
> > from Humayun's Tomb. The princes were summarily
> > executed.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com