oops, was only joking. i understand at least some of the larger issues.
just thought that the patently stupid sector specific commitment on
planning via architecture firms, defying CPC distinction itself, was a
good place to start, also since all limitations are also illusory for plg,
to get to saying whole 867 needs re-look.
> AZ plan wrote:
>
>>
>> it does seem good idea to point out the difference between sub-classes
>> in
>> the UN code (poor ole planning has problem, it is sub-class!) and
>> implications of other details
>>
>
> gita, i think the issues are slightly larger than the old architecture
> versus planning games. they are also slightly more urgent. i think
> planning, landscaping and gardening are correctly slotted together and
> in the right place anyways. can we take-up this eternal argument some
> other time?
>
>> letter draft / points to raise would help. I will have a go for planning
>> (with bit about architecture, legit-ly, as for some curious reason only
>> limitation to market access for planning is establishment only through
>> incorporation as partnership firm constituted by Architects!)
>>
>
> again, this is really not about power-plays about planning as such. it
> is about the access of international practices in the marketplace. it is
> also about some gaps in inter-governmental communications regarding
> classifications UN 867xx, which must be explicated immediately or
> they'll throw open all 867xx professions anyhow (planning included), and
> it'll be a hell of a job correcting the mess - to compete with global
> practices in india will change our priorities and the complexion of the
> profession a bit.
>
> alright, so probably i will end in speaking to a stone. after all, you
> are a planner.
>
> - anand. (who is off to the ministry on monday, will speak privately,
> and say planners have hijacked his public conversation with their
> power-concerns, sorry!)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
just thought that the patently stupid sector specific commitment on
planning via architecture firms, defying CPC distinction itself, was a
good place to start, also since all limitations are also illusory for plg,
to get to saying whole 867 needs re-look.
> AZ plan wrote:
>
>>
>> it does seem good idea to point out the difference between sub-classes
>> in
>> the UN code (poor ole planning has problem, it is sub-class!) and
>> implications of other details
>>
>
> gita, i think the issues are slightly larger than the old architecture
> versus planning games. they are also slightly more urgent. i think
> planning, landscaping and gardening are correctly slotted together and
> in the right place anyways. can we take-up this eternal argument some
> other time?
>
>> letter draft / points to raise would help. I will have a go for planning
>> (with bit about architecture, legit-ly, as for some curious reason only
>> limitation to market access for planning is establishment only through
>> incorporation as partnership firm constituted by Architects!)
>>
>
> again, this is really not about power-plays about planning as such. it
> is about the access of international practices in the marketplace. it is
> also about some gaps in inter-governmental communications regarding
> classifications UN 867xx, which must be explicated immediately or
> they'll throw open all 867xx professions anyhow (planning included), and
> it'll be a hell of a job correcting the mess - to compete with global
> practices in india will change our priorities and the complexion of the
> profession a bit.
>
> alright, so probably i will end in speaking to a stone. after all, you
> are a planner.
>
> - anand. (who is off to the ministry on monday, will speak privately,
> and say planners have hijacked his public conversation with their
> power-concerns, sorry!)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>