Sorry for replying to this late, but an awful lot of
mpisgmedia mail is going to my yahoo bulk (spam) mail
folder.
Wrt>> Please suggest a positive course of action.
1) Are you sure that prawn malai in Hum Tomb was
illegal in law? Please specify how.
2) If so, possibly section 409 IPC. I for one will
write to APJK asking for permission to prosecute DG
Archaeological Survey of India (or whoever) is
entrusted with maintaining and preserving this
monument, and/or thr Torism Minister who has
misappropriated it for illegal uses.
Sarbajit
--- nalini thakur <rak1993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As per law today it is not possible to indulge in
> prawn malai what ever the
> astrologers say. Please be serious and understand
> the underlying gravity
> that Gita is trying to point out.
> Please suggest a positive course of action.
> Thank You
> Nalini
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sarbajit roy" <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Master plan issues in media"
> <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [mpisgmedia] Prawn malai at Humayun's
> Tomb?
> 1857&2005:mangalpandey, humayun tomb, oxford
>
>
> Love your discovery of coincidences .. although its
> foundation in the mathematics of probability seems
> wobbly.
>
> Did you know if you have a group of only 23 people -
> the probability that 2 people in that group have the
> same birthday is better than even .. ie. more than
> 50%?
>
> Similarly if you take 2 dates (such as 7 Sept) in
> any
> random grouping of 23 posts .. you'll probably find
> a
> connection somewhere. Its well exploited by all
> those
> astrologers whose knowledge of probstats wud put us
> techno-experts to shame.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > | Express has two cons reports today:
> >
> > | Indian national t.a.c.h is planning
> >
> > ...to restore the erstwhile glory of the
> Coronation
> > Memorial. It was here in 1911, that George V and
> > Queen
> > Mary annointed Delhi as the seat of power in the
> > coronation durbar... UK High Commissioner has also
> > promised assistance...
> >
>
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=149451
> > (INTACH plans to restore Coronation Park,
> memorial)
> >
> > | and union Culture Ministry is planning
> >
> > ...to bring in a set of guidelines for hosting
> gala
> > events at ''fragile'' heritage sites. There have
> > already been two receptions ...one, by the Aga
> Khan
> > Trust for Culture, which contributed to rebuilding
> > the
> > mausoleum, from restoring its waterworks to
> planting
> > trees favoured by the Mughals, to the more recent
> > Blair reception...
> >
>
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=78513
> > Prawn Malai at Humayun's Tomb? Reddy's watching
> >
> > | both illegal parties at Humayun's Tomb
> > | are also otherwise flagged, here:
> >
> >
>
http://plan.architexturez.net/site/profession/awards/akaa/041129
> > Aga Khan Award ceremony at Humayun's Tomb,
> > 27.11.2004
> >
> > http://plan.architexturez.net/site/anomie/f/050910
> > 1857 & 2005: Mangal Pandey, Humayun's Tomb and
> > Oxford
> >
> > Mangal Pandey, hanged in April 1857, was released
> in
> > August 2005. British Film Council's contribution
> of
> > £
> > 150,000 to the film is explained by its British
> > co-producer: "It criticizes the East India
> Company,
> > not the British Government". Already, Indian Prime
> > Minister Manmohan Singh had dwelled on "beneficial
> > consequences" of "India's experience with
> Britain",
> > on
> > 8 July 2005 at Oxford. On 8 July 1858 was signed
> the
> > treaty that ended the Indian Rebellion and paved
> the
> > way for transfer of power from British East India
> > Company to British Crown. Isolated incidents, like
> > by
> > Mangal Pandey, had became Great Indian Mutiny
> after
> > the British lost Delhi on 11 May 1857. On 21
> > September
> > they recaptured it and a Major Hodson with his 50
> > Sikhs took Bahadurshah Zafar captive from
> Humayun's
> > Tomb and returned with 100 of his men to take the
> > Emperor's two sons and grandson, whom he summarily
> > executed. Preparations for re-taking of Delhi by
> the
> > British were precipitated on 7 September 1857. On
> 7
> > September 2005, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan
> Singh
> > and his wife Gursharan Kaur hosted a dinner in
> > honour
> > of British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his wife
> > Cherie Blair, at Humayun's Tomb.
> >
> > The following is the small collection of texts in
> > which I found these coincidences and more. I am
> not
> > history buff, nor war buff. I was looking simply
> > because I was distressed by our Prime Minister
> > partying at Humayun's Tomb, not once but twice (as
> > Chief Guest of the Aga Khan on 27 November 2004
> and
> > as
> > host to Tony Blair on 7 September 2005), even
> though
> > such partying is impermissible in law and despite
> > protest (in 2004 by myself against re-honouring of
> a
> > DfiD funded Indore project amounting to civic
> > disaster
> > and other interferences in urban development
> > paradigms
> > and professional practice and in 2005 by a section
> > of
> > The Left against the Blair visit in view of Iraq
> and
> > WTO). I had turned to Google in hope of finding,
> for
> > peace of mind, that the association of Humayun's
> > Tomb
> > with 1857 was insignificant. Now I am aghast.
> >
> > Of course, my search was far from scholarly and I
> > would be greatly relieved to be corrected. If,
> > however, I have stumbled upon something
> significant,
> > I
> > wish our History would record, now, who all
> amongst
> > those connected with either party at the Tomb and
> > who
> > all amongst those deciding how our History should
> be
> > taught or show-cased are aware of it. This is to
> > distinguish between those who knew exactly what
> they
> > were doing or not doing about the partying at the
> > Tomb
> > (and ought to answer for their deliberate
> disrespect
> > of History) and those who knew not what they did
> or
> > did not (and ought to relinquish responsibilities
> > for
> > minding our affairs for that reason).
> >
> > | The Indian Rebellion of 1857 | Mangal Pandey,
> 1857
> > &
> > 2005 | The 1857 Siege of Delhi | Humayun's Tomb,
> > 1857
> > & 2005 | Devil's Wind after "Peace Treaty" of 8
> July
> > 1858 | Oxford 1858 & 8 July 2005 |
> >
> > contd/
> > http://plan.architexturez.net/site/anomie/f/050910
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
mpisgmedia mail is going to my yahoo bulk (spam) mail
folder.
Wrt>> Please suggest a positive course of action.
1) Are you sure that prawn malai in Hum Tomb was
illegal in law? Please specify how.
2) If so, possibly section 409 IPC. I for one will
write to APJK asking for permission to prosecute DG
Archaeological Survey of India (or whoever) is
entrusted with maintaining and preserving this
monument, and/or thr Torism Minister who has
misappropriated it for illegal uses.
Sarbajit
--- nalini thakur <rak1993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As per law today it is not possible to indulge in
> prawn malai what ever the
> astrologers say. Please be serious and understand
> the underlying gravity
> that Gita is trying to point out.
> Please suggest a positive course of action.
> Thank You
> Nalini
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sarbajit roy" <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Master plan issues in media"
> <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [mpisgmedia] Prawn malai at Humayun's
> Tomb?
> 1857&2005:mangalpandey, humayun tomb, oxford
>
>
> Love your discovery of coincidences .. although its
> foundation in the mathematics of probability seems
> wobbly.
>
> Did you know if you have a group of only 23 people -
> the probability that 2 people in that group have the
> same birthday is better than even .. ie. more than
> 50%?
>
> Similarly if you take 2 dates (such as 7 Sept) in
> any
> random grouping of 23 posts .. you'll probably find
> a
> connection somewhere. Its well exploited by all
> those
> astrologers whose knowledge of probstats wud put us
> techno-experts to shame.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > | Express has two cons reports today:
> >
> > | Indian national t.a.c.h is planning
> >
> > ...to restore the erstwhile glory of the
> Coronation
> > Memorial. It was here in 1911, that George V and
> > Queen
> > Mary annointed Delhi as the seat of power in the
> > coronation durbar... UK High Commissioner has also
> > promised assistance...
> >
>
http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=149451
> > (INTACH plans to restore Coronation Park,
> memorial)
> >
> > | and union Culture Ministry is planning
> >
> > ...to bring in a set of guidelines for hosting
> gala
> > events at ''fragile'' heritage sites. There have
> > already been two receptions ...one, by the Aga
> Khan
> > Trust for Culture, which contributed to rebuilding
> > the
> > mausoleum, from restoring its waterworks to
> planting
> > trees favoured by the Mughals, to the more recent
> > Blair reception...
> >
>
http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=78513
> > Prawn Malai at Humayun's Tomb? Reddy's watching
> >
> > | both illegal parties at Humayun's Tomb
> > | are also otherwise flagged, here:
> >
> >
>
http://plan.architexturez.net/site/profession/awards/akaa/041129
> > Aga Khan Award ceremony at Humayun's Tomb,
> > 27.11.2004
> >
> > http://plan.architexturez.net/site/anomie/f/050910
> > 1857 & 2005: Mangal Pandey, Humayun's Tomb and
> > Oxford
> >
> > Mangal Pandey, hanged in April 1857, was released
> in
> > August 2005. British Film Council's contribution
> of
> > £
> > 150,000 to the film is explained by its British
> > co-producer: "It criticizes the East India
> Company,
> > not the British Government". Already, Indian Prime
> > Minister Manmohan Singh had dwelled on "beneficial
> > consequences" of "India's experience with
> Britain",
> > on
> > 8 July 2005 at Oxford. On 8 July 1858 was signed
> the
> > treaty that ended the Indian Rebellion and paved
> the
> > way for transfer of power from British East India
> > Company to British Crown. Isolated incidents, like
> > by
> > Mangal Pandey, had became Great Indian Mutiny
> after
> > the British lost Delhi on 11 May 1857. On 21
> > September
> > they recaptured it and a Major Hodson with his 50
> > Sikhs took Bahadurshah Zafar captive from
> Humayun's
> > Tomb and returned with 100 of his men to take the
> > Emperor's two sons and grandson, whom he summarily
> > executed. Preparations for re-taking of Delhi by
> the
> > British were precipitated on 7 September 1857. On
> 7
> > September 2005, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan
> Singh
> > and his wife Gursharan Kaur hosted a dinner in
> > honour
> > of British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his wife
> > Cherie Blair, at Humayun's Tomb.
> >
> > The following is the small collection of texts in
> > which I found these coincidences and more. I am
> not
> > history buff, nor war buff. I was looking simply
> > because I was distressed by our Prime Minister
> > partying at Humayun's Tomb, not once but twice (as
> > Chief Guest of the Aga Khan on 27 November 2004
> and
> > as
> > host to Tony Blair on 7 September 2005), even
> though
> > such partying is impermissible in law and despite
> > protest (in 2004 by myself against re-honouring of
> a
> > DfiD funded Indore project amounting to civic
> > disaster
> > and other interferences in urban development
> > paradigms
> > and professional practice and in 2005 by a section
> > of
> > The Left against the Blair visit in view of Iraq
> and
> > WTO). I had turned to Google in hope of finding,
> for
> > peace of mind, that the association of Humayun's
> > Tomb
> > with 1857 was insignificant. Now I am aghast.
> >
> > Of course, my search was far from scholarly and I
> > would be greatly relieved to be corrected. If,
> > however, I have stumbled upon something
> significant,
> > I
> > wish our History would record, now, who all
> amongst
> > those connected with either party at the Tomb and
> > who
> > all amongst those deciding how our History should
> be
> > taught or show-cased are aware of it. This is to
> > distinguish between those who knew exactly what
> they
> > were doing or not doing about the partying at the
> > Tomb
> > (and ought to answer for their deliberate
> disrespect
> > of History) and those who knew not what they did
> or
> > did not (and ought to relinquish responsibilities
> > for
> > minding our affairs for that reason).
> >
> > | The Indian Rebellion of 1857 | Mangal Pandey,
> 1857
> > &
> > 2005 | The 1857 Siege of Delhi | Humayun's Tomb,
> > 1857
> > & 2005 | Devil's Wind after "Peace Treaty" of 8
> July
> > 1858 | Oxford 1858 & 8 July 2005 |
> >
> > contd/
> > http://plan.architexturez.net/site/anomie/f/050910
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com