PM TO LAUNCH JAWAHARLAL NEHRU NATIONAL URBAN RENEWAL
MISSION
PROPOSED EXPENDITURE ON MISSION ONE LAKH CRORE RUPEES
http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=13437
PMO press release ahead of Parliament to say UPA govt
has approved extrapolation of NDA Urban Reform
Incentive Fund to twin-mission-mode separation of
urban development and urban poverty agenda, abandoning
of equity guaranteeing frameworks for integrated
development. In sozzled spirit of haloed 74th *State
governments/urban local bodies will be required to
sign a Memorandum of Agreement with the Central
Government, giving an undertaking to implement the
reform agenda, as per a mutually agreed road map. Fund
releases will be linked to assessment of the
implementation of reform agenda*. The *mutually agreed
roadmap* is plotted, in name of same haloed 74th, on
model municipal law that USAID had drafted for India
with NDA. The same model law has become now
USAID-sponsored Delhi Municipal Corporation
(Amendment) Bill, 2005. In enthusiastic presumption of
this USAID-sponsored law the Capital has been
crafting, in name of innocuous sounding building
byelaw reform, the coup-de-grace for the badly whipped
Master Plan framework. On this successful
pilot-project of two-year long and continuing fraud on
the Constitution, the PM can confidently launch
*mutually agreed* missions.
I hope people make time to at least check out what the
USAID sponsored law has in store for them now that it
is approved to be unleashed in mission-mode.
--- H U BIJLANI <hubijlani@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Full Marks. U r right. H.U.Bijlani
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gita Dewan Verma" <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:04 AM
> Subject: [mpisgmedia] MCD (Amendment) Bill, 2005
> (building-byelaws business)
>
>
> > The "Building byelaw reform" that Delhi Municipal
> > Corporation has been carrying out since December
> 2003
> > was referred by Delhi Government to Union Ministry
> of
> > Home Affairs on 27 October 2005, as "Regulatory
> > Framework for Building Regulation in Delhi". This
> > includes a USAID-sponsored Bill to amend the MCD
> Act.
> > The Bill proposes drastic changes in the framework
> for
> > urban development and the relation between
> government,
> > citizens and professionals and is consonant with
> > recent FDI decisions, revised offer for WTO-GATS,
> etc,
> > and in conflict with provisions of other laws and
> the
> > Constitution. This note is about this Bill, of
> which
> > the "building byelaw reform" is both creature and
> > instrumentality and for nearly two years has also
> been
> > smoke screen.
> >
> > In face of comprehensive consensus (that exists by
> > fact of being publicly claimed and not having been
> > publicly denied or decried) on "building byelaw
> > reform" and USAID-sponsored legislation under that
> > garb I am not inclined to defend my view that this
> > scurrilous Bill not only needs to be scrapped but
> also
> > calls for exemplary exercise of s.490 of MCD Act
> > ("Dissolution of the Corporation: (1) If, in the
> > opinion of the Central Government, the Corporation
> > persistently makes default in the performance of
> the
> > duties imposed on it by or under this Act or
> exceeds
> > or abuses its powers, the Central Government may
> by an
> > order published, together with a statement of
> reasons
> > therefore, in the Official Gazette, dissolve the
> > Corporation"). > I have sought information of
> > procedure, if any, by which I might urge / inform
> > Central Government opinion under s.490 <see>
> >
> > This note only points out the changes proposed and
> a
> > few related points of law and facts.
> >
> > contd/-
> > http://plan.architexturez.org/site/mpisg/p/051116
> >
> >
> >
> >
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
MISSION
PROPOSED EXPENDITURE ON MISSION ONE LAKH CRORE RUPEES
http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=13437
PMO press release ahead of Parliament to say UPA govt
has approved extrapolation of NDA Urban Reform
Incentive Fund to twin-mission-mode separation of
urban development and urban poverty agenda, abandoning
of equity guaranteeing frameworks for integrated
development. In sozzled spirit of haloed 74th *State
governments/urban local bodies will be required to
sign a Memorandum of Agreement with the Central
Government, giving an undertaking to implement the
reform agenda, as per a mutually agreed road map. Fund
releases will be linked to assessment of the
implementation of reform agenda*. The *mutually agreed
roadmap* is plotted, in name of same haloed 74th, on
model municipal law that USAID had drafted for India
with NDA. The same model law has become now
USAID-sponsored Delhi Municipal Corporation
(Amendment) Bill, 2005. In enthusiastic presumption of
this USAID-sponsored law the Capital has been
crafting, in name of innocuous sounding building
byelaw reform, the coup-de-grace for the badly whipped
Master Plan framework. On this successful
pilot-project of two-year long and continuing fraud on
the Constitution, the PM can confidently launch
*mutually agreed* missions.
I hope people make time to at least check out what the
USAID sponsored law has in store for them now that it
is approved to be unleashed in mission-mode.
--- H U BIJLANI <hubijlani@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Full Marks. U r right. H.U.Bijlani
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gita Dewan Verma" <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:04 AM
> Subject: [mpisgmedia] MCD (Amendment) Bill, 2005
> (building-byelaws business)
>
>
> > The "Building byelaw reform" that Delhi Municipal
> > Corporation has been carrying out since December
> 2003
> > was referred by Delhi Government to Union Ministry
> of
> > Home Affairs on 27 October 2005, as "Regulatory
> > Framework for Building Regulation in Delhi". This
> > includes a USAID-sponsored Bill to amend the MCD
> Act.
> > The Bill proposes drastic changes in the framework
> for
> > urban development and the relation between
> government,
> > citizens and professionals and is consonant with
> > recent FDI decisions, revised offer for WTO-GATS,
> etc,
> > and in conflict with provisions of other laws and
> the
> > Constitution. This note is about this Bill, of
> which
> > the "building byelaw reform" is both creature and
> > instrumentality and for nearly two years has also
> been
> > smoke screen.
> >
> > In face of comprehensive consensus (that exists by
> > fact of being publicly claimed and not having been
> > publicly denied or decried) on "building byelaw
> > reform" and USAID-sponsored legislation under that
> > garb I am not inclined to defend my view that this
> > scurrilous Bill not only needs to be scrapped but
> also
> > calls for exemplary exercise of s.490 of MCD Act
> > ("Dissolution of the Corporation: (1) If, in the
> > opinion of the Central Government, the Corporation
> > persistently makes default in the performance of
> the
> > duties imposed on it by or under this Act or
> exceeds
> > or abuses its powers, the Central Government may
> by an
> > order published, together with a statement of
> reasons
> > therefore, in the Official Gazette, dissolve the
> > Corporation"). > I have sought information of
> > procedure, if any, by which I might urge / inform
> > Central Government opinion under s.490 <see>
> >
> > This note only points out the changes proposed and
> a
> > few related points of law and facts.
> >
> > contd/-
> > http://plan.architexturez.org/site/mpisg/p/051116
> >
> >
> >
> >
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com