Dear Mr Dayal,
My eml of 07.01.06 to your eml id came back as your
account was over quota. I have dispatched the same by
courier and am re-sending it on the assumption that
the problem would have been solved today (Monday)
since the same eml id is also the one for sending
suggestions as per your public notice in HT dated
06.01.06.
My eml is also archived at:
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00778.shtml
Yours sincerely
Gita Dewan Verma, Planner
--- MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Date: 7 Jan 2006 11:48:24 -0000
> From: MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxx
> To: mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: failure notice
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to
> the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it
> didn't work out.
>
> <anuj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 64.224.219.122 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 User Over Quota
> Giving up on 64.224.219.122.
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Return-Path: <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Received: (qmail 8981 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan
> 2006 11:48:23 -0000
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
>
>
h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
>
>
b=gF5Nhz2tpKzxdoHDmPiBd4bR5cApClaM5f320YlQwtMFYKy1cO3xWz7NjVlu+BbCP8Qv2nsXV+oOi+7wiY7xZn+1dCjC4T7jExjwMcF85Fwbhm2qBqsHqJP4aSGyb4wR3n5Kn7pXrECUNALWwSoP4Cx7qF5qNPKFGyl4qiET7cc=
> ;
> Message-ID:
>
<20060107114823.8979.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Received: from [203.122.39.30] by
> web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 07 Jan
> 2006 03:48:23 PST
> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 03:48:23 -0800 (PST)
> From: Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: DMRC Public Notice re EIA for Ph.2 / RTI
> requests
> To: anuj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>
> Mr Anuj Dayal,
> CPRO & CPIO, DMRC
>
> Dear Mr Dayal,
>
> Please refer to DMRC Public Notice published on p.8
> of
> Hindustan Times dated 06.01.06. This is issued in
> your
> name, invites suggestions on Phase-2 EIA report and
> says the EIA report is available on DMRC website.
>
> 1. I am not able to locate the EIA report on DMRC
> website. As an imperative of s.4(1)(c), besides
> claim
> in your Public Notice, please ensure publication
> with
> link from main page, etc.
>
> 2. Your Public Notice does not specify the statutory
> provisions under which you have issued it or by
> which
> you will process the suggestions invited. Kindly
> ensure that website publication under s.4(1)(c) is
> complete in this respect.
>
> 3. In case of delay in website publication, and if
> convenient also otherwise, kindly send me a copy of
> the report. I believe I can request this under
> s.4(1)(d) of RTI Act as affected person in regard to
> your decision to invite suggestions from public on
> an
> EIA report, in view of the following:
> (a) DMRC has not disclosed in my pending writ
> petition
> the procedures it follows for EIA
> (b) You have not answered my RTI requests about
> procedures for public participation in metro related
> decisions
>
> 4. While searching for the EIA report on DMRC
> website
> I noticed that the What-is-New section has an item
> on
> the IT Park inauguration on 02.04.2005, with
> photographs of dignitaries as well as the one of the
> building that is posted also on the updated property
> development page. With reference to that I had made,
> vide my eml dated 02.01.05, requests under s.4(1)(b)
> and s.4(1)(d) of RTI Act and for confirmation right
> away of rejection of my prior requests under
> s.4(1)(c)
> vide emls dated 18.10.05, 25.10.05 and 08.11.05. My
> eml of 02.01.05, with urls of the previous emls for
> your ready reference, is at:
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00758.shtml
> I await your response, with urgency in view of your
> Public Notice as well as of news reports of some
> objection now (after approvals and hearing, etc) to
> the DMRC-proposed financial plan for Kochi metro.
>
> I have been wondering if there might be an error in
> your eml id as published on the website, but the
> same
> is published also in your Public Notice. I assume,
> therefore, that my emls have reached you. For your
> convenience, I will also dispatch text of this eml
> by
> courier. The only reason I can think of for you not
> having acknowledged or replied to my emls is that
> perhaps DMRC has some sort of exemption from RTI
> Act.
> If that is the case, please let me know.
>
> Thanking you,
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Gita Dewan Verma, Planner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
My eml of 07.01.06 to your eml id came back as your
account was over quota. I have dispatched the same by
courier and am re-sending it on the assumption that
the problem would have been solved today (Monday)
since the same eml id is also the one for sending
suggestions as per your public notice in HT dated
06.01.06.
My eml is also archived at:
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00778.shtml
Yours sincerely
Gita Dewan Verma, Planner
--- MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Date: 7 Jan 2006 11:48:24 -0000
> From: MAILER-DAEMON@xxxxxxxxx
> To: mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: failure notice
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to
> the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it
> didn't work out.
>
> <anuj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 64.224.219.122 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 User Over Quota
> Giving up on 64.224.219.122.
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Return-Path: <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Received: (qmail 8981 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan
> 2006 11:48:23 -0000
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
> s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
>
>
h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
>
>
b=gF5Nhz2tpKzxdoHDmPiBd4bR5cApClaM5f320YlQwtMFYKy1cO3xWz7NjVlu+BbCP8Qv2nsXV+oOi+7wiY7xZn+1dCjC4T7jExjwMcF85Fwbhm2qBqsHqJP4aSGyb4wR3n5Kn7pXrECUNALWwSoP4Cx7qF5qNPKFGyl4qiET7cc=
> ;
> Message-ID:
>
<20060107114823.8979.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Received: from [203.122.39.30] by
> web35601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 07 Jan
> 2006 03:48:23 PST
> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 03:48:23 -0800 (PST)
> From: Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: DMRC Public Notice re EIA for Ph.2 / RTI
> requests
> To: anuj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>
> Mr Anuj Dayal,
> CPRO & CPIO, DMRC
>
> Dear Mr Dayal,
>
> Please refer to DMRC Public Notice published on p.8
> of
> Hindustan Times dated 06.01.06. This is issued in
> your
> name, invites suggestions on Phase-2 EIA report and
> says the EIA report is available on DMRC website.
>
> 1. I am not able to locate the EIA report on DMRC
> website. As an imperative of s.4(1)(c), besides
> claim
> in your Public Notice, please ensure publication
> with
> link from main page, etc.
>
> 2. Your Public Notice does not specify the statutory
> provisions under which you have issued it or by
> which
> you will process the suggestions invited. Kindly
> ensure that website publication under s.4(1)(c) is
> complete in this respect.
>
> 3. In case of delay in website publication, and if
> convenient also otherwise, kindly send me a copy of
> the report. I believe I can request this under
> s.4(1)(d) of RTI Act as affected person in regard to
> your decision to invite suggestions from public on
> an
> EIA report, in view of the following:
> (a) DMRC has not disclosed in my pending writ
> petition
> the procedures it follows for EIA
> (b) You have not answered my RTI requests about
> procedures for public participation in metro related
> decisions
>
> 4. While searching for the EIA report on DMRC
> website
> I noticed that the What-is-New section has an item
> on
> the IT Park inauguration on 02.04.2005, with
> photographs of dignitaries as well as the one of the
> building that is posted also on the updated property
> development page. With reference to that I had made,
> vide my eml dated 02.01.05, requests under s.4(1)(b)
> and s.4(1)(d) of RTI Act and for confirmation right
> away of rejection of my prior requests under
> s.4(1)(c)
> vide emls dated 18.10.05, 25.10.05 and 08.11.05. My
> eml of 02.01.05, with urls of the previous emls for
> your ready reference, is at:
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00758.shtml
> I await your response, with urgency in view of your
> Public Notice as well as of news reports of some
> objection now (after approvals and hearing, etc) to
> the DMRC-proposed financial plan for Kochi metro.
>
> I have been wondering if there might be an error in
> your eml id as published on the website, but the
> same
> is published also in your Public Notice. I assume,
> therefore, that my emls have reached you. For your
> convenience, I will also dispatch text of this eml
> by
> courier. The only reason I can think of for you not
> having acknowledged or replied to my emls is that
> perhaps DMRC has some sort of exemption from RTI
> Act.
> If that is the case, please let me know.
>
> Thanking you,
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Gita Dewan Verma, Planner
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________
> Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> dsl.yahoo.com
>
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com