MoUD had not filed reply and has been directed to do
so, failing which the Secretary will have to be
present at next hearing.
5.4.06
on 22.3.06
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the PIL filed in 2003 by an mpisg convenor for
> enforcement of master plan provisions for villages
> in
> mehrauli-mahipalpur area and stopping unplanned
> illegal projects using up land and water needed for
> them, High Court DB of J Virender Jain has directed
> MoUD to file reply by next hearing and that the
> matter
> be listed along with the mpisg PIL (filed in 2002
> jointly by all mpisg groups in vasant kunj area)
> against unfettered disposal of planned commercial
> sites in residential schemes, listed on 5 april.
>
> Earlier today the batch of matters relating to
> unauthorised constructions came up and was adjourned
> to 2 pm tomorrow. Like the matters relating to the
> business of free seats in schools these seem to need
> larger courtroom. MIB were flowing way out and those
> inside took long moments to stream out.
>
> By comparison our hearing was most dignified. Anupam
> Lal Das succinctly put across our case, opposite
> counsel were most attentive and Lordship was very
> firm
> about MoUD failure to reply. Anupam also mentioned
> that MCD counter-affidavit claimed no role in the
> area
> but Mehrauli-Mahipalpur road was listed in its
> Public
> Notice pursuant to Supreme Court orders. Lordship
> gently observed that MCD perhaps itself does not
> know.
> We hope MCD reads in that some reassurance amidst
> endless media tirade to conjure a court v/s MCD
> situation in PIL matters that, by definition, are
> meant to be non-adversarial. And we do look forward
> to
> hearing from MoUD - on affidavit. (it has also not
> filed reply since 2002 in the commercial use matter)
>
> by way of further evidence of worth of MIB, I got
> (a)
> lift back from passing cab-driver who is client of
> Anupam in the Arjun Camp matters with stop-over for
> juice at client of Ruksana in the commercial use
> matter and (b) for my memoirs Anupam-case of
> invaluable ethereal MIB-practice of arriving before
> matter in court to, er, stare.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
so, failing which the Secretary will have to be
present at next hearing.
5.4.06
on 22.3.06
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the PIL filed in 2003 by an mpisg convenor for
> enforcement of master plan provisions for villages
> in
> mehrauli-mahipalpur area and stopping unplanned
> illegal projects using up land and water needed for
> them, High Court DB of J Virender Jain has directed
> MoUD to file reply by next hearing and that the
> matter
> be listed along with the mpisg PIL (filed in 2002
> jointly by all mpisg groups in vasant kunj area)
> against unfettered disposal of planned commercial
> sites in residential schemes, listed on 5 april.
>
> Earlier today the batch of matters relating to
> unauthorised constructions came up and was adjourned
> to 2 pm tomorrow. Like the matters relating to the
> business of free seats in schools these seem to need
> larger courtroom. MIB were flowing way out and those
> inside took long moments to stream out.
>
> By comparison our hearing was most dignified. Anupam
> Lal Das succinctly put across our case, opposite
> counsel were most attentive and Lordship was very
> firm
> about MoUD failure to reply. Anupam also mentioned
> that MCD counter-affidavit claimed no role in the
> area
> but Mehrauli-Mahipalpur road was listed in its
> Public
> Notice pursuant to Supreme Court orders. Lordship
> gently observed that MCD perhaps itself does not
> know.
> We hope MCD reads in that some reassurance amidst
> endless media tirade to conjure a court v/s MCD
> situation in PIL matters that, by definition, are
> meant to be non-adversarial. And we do look forward
> to
> hearing from MoUD - on affidavit. (it has also not
> filed reply since 2002 in the commercial use matter)
>
> by way of further evidence of worth of MIB, I got
> (a)
> lift back from passing cab-driver who is client of
> Anupam in the Arjun Camp matters with stop-over for
> juice at client of Ruksana in the commercial use
> matter and (b) for my memoirs Anupam-case of
> invaluable ethereal MIB-practice of arriving before
> matter in court to, er, stare.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com