Hi, now u tell u are out of town!
finally-notified means impugned final notification dt
26-02-06. they are rubbing in their finality
the decision is in para-7 of what was sent to me
(called *proceedings of the Board* in the covering
letter). Para-1 quotes from the court order, para-2
says the Board was promptly constituted, para-3 is
about informing the Board about the misplacing of my
objections, para-4 has list of MOUD/DDA communications
about the project (as relevant vital material facts at
the outset), para-5 is their summary of my objections,
para-6 addresses the summary, para-7 declares the
decision.
I can view this as a speaking-order, but cannot see
how it speaks to me. also, it turns out Com(Plg) was
present at my hearing as member of the board. we are
going back to court to report the less than full
compliance.
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Gita,
> Am busy velaing in Mysore (there's a huge JNURM scam
> also going on here BTW).
>
> This is hardly a "speaking" order - more like a
> "tiptoeing" one :-)
>
> What do they mean by "finally notified" ??
>
> Sarbajit
>
> Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I
> have received on 15.06.06 the speaking-order of the
> Board on my court ordered hearing (to me it seems
> more
> like counter-affidavit in defence of the project
> than
> order on my objections, but then I do not know what
> exactly speaking-order means).
>
> The decision of the Board (to which the court order
> made confirming the bid etc subject) is, quite
> expectedly, that it *does not find any infirmity in
> the notification dated 23-2-06 and upholds the
> process
> of change of landuse notified vide notification
> dated
> 23-2-06, which has already been finally notified*.
>
> I guess Rajinder & Anr will go back to court.
>
> We won in this round:
>
> (a) unique specimen of post-notification hearing of
> objections, deserving pride of place in
> any memorial or eulogy for planning law (in my
> memoirs
> it shall have that also as unique case of prompt
> compliance of court order, for which I guess I owe
> thanks to DLF Universal Ltd and Indiabulls whose 100
> cr emd acted as speed-money).
>
> (b) clear proof that we are n-o-t ngo, as alleged by
> our respondents, and n-o-t agitating public interest
> under garb of private interest: no public-spirited
> or
> ngo munches took any interest in the 15-day window
> of
> opportunity to protest Tehkhand and the
> speaking-order
> description of it, *in-situ with participation of
> the
> stakeholders, slum dwellers and private sector*,
> exactly matches their demands.
>
> We lost: A bit of our confidence in the
> possibilities
> of s.11A, but only a wee bit, as what it would have
> taken to uphold the DD Act rather than the
> notification in the peculiar circumstances is beyond
> the realm of reasonable expectations. and we are
> ordinary reasonable chaps.
>
>
> I will post the speaking-order etc by and by.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
finally-notified means impugned final notification dt
26-02-06. they are rubbing in their finality
the decision is in para-7 of what was sent to me
(called *proceedings of the Board* in the covering
letter). Para-1 quotes from the court order, para-2
says the Board was promptly constituted, para-3 is
about informing the Board about the misplacing of my
objections, para-4 has list of MOUD/DDA communications
about the project (as relevant vital material facts at
the outset), para-5 is their summary of my objections,
para-6 addresses the summary, para-7 declares the
decision.
I can view this as a speaking-order, but cannot see
how it speaks to me. also, it turns out Com(Plg) was
present at my hearing as member of the board. we are
going back to court to report the less than full
compliance.
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Gita,
> Am busy velaing in Mysore (there's a huge JNURM scam
> also going on here BTW).
>
> This is hardly a "speaking" order - more like a
> "tiptoeing" one :-)
>
> What do they mean by "finally notified" ??
>
> Sarbajit
>
> Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I
> have received on 15.06.06 the speaking-order of the
> Board on my court ordered hearing (to me it seems
> more
> like counter-affidavit in defence of the project
> than
> order on my objections, but then I do not know what
> exactly speaking-order means).
>
> The decision of the Board (to which the court order
> made confirming the bid etc subject) is, quite
> expectedly, that it *does not find any infirmity in
> the notification dated 23-2-06 and upholds the
> process
> of change of landuse notified vide notification
> dated
> 23-2-06, which has already been finally notified*.
>
> I guess Rajinder & Anr will go back to court.
>
> We won in this round:
>
> (a) unique specimen of post-notification hearing of
> objections, deserving pride of place in
> any memorial or eulogy for planning law (in my
> memoirs
> it shall have that also as unique case of prompt
> compliance of court order, for which I guess I owe
> thanks to DLF Universal Ltd and Indiabulls whose 100
> cr emd acted as speed-money).
>
> (b) clear proof that we are n-o-t ngo, as alleged by
> our respondents, and n-o-t agitating public interest
> under garb of private interest: no public-spirited
> or
> ngo munches took any interest in the 15-day window
> of
> opportunity to protest Tehkhand and the
> speaking-order
> description of it, *in-situ with participation of
> the
> stakeholders, slum dwellers and private sector*,
> exactly matches their demands.
>
> We lost: A bit of our confidence in the
> possibilities
> of s.11A, but only a wee bit, as what it would have
> taken to uphold the DD Act rather than the
> notification in the peculiar circumstances is beyond
> the realm of reasonable expectations. and we are
> ordinary reasonable chaps.
>
>
> I will post the speaking-order etc by and by.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com