> Reply to: RE>Deleuze on Spinoza
>
>Hello, I don't know your name,
My name is Jan Sjunnesson, male Swede, on the margin (refrain?) of PhD
studies in philsoophy in the most analytical of all sites, Uppsala, and
coldest (-2 below, now back form Tunisian 22 o C) . . Thanks for your
comments on Spinoza / Deluze, I=B4ll check it out/jan
but you asked if there has been much of a
>response to Deleuze's 'Expressionism in Philosophy'? Most commentators on
>Spinoza since the publication of Expressionism have been influenced by it i=
n
>one way or another and almost all refer to it, especially those publishing =
in
>France - see A. Negri's 'The Savage Anomaly' (Negri says he could not have
>written his book without Deleuze's reading of Spinoza) and E. Balibar. (in
>almost all his papers on Spinoza there are references to Deleuze). There is=
a
>paper by P. Macherey coming out in Paul Patton (ed.) collection on Deleuze
>(Deleuze: a Critical Reader), which deals very critically with Deleuze's
>treatment of Spinoza and with the wider question of historiography in
>Deleuze's method of 'interpreting' in general.
>Of course, the influence of deleuze's reading of Spinoza is not only felt i=
n
>the fairly narrow field of Spinoza scholarship, but elsewhere - in feminism
>for example (Moira Gatens and Genevieve Lloyd). Well, that's all I can thin=
k
>of for the moment. Hope its of some help.
>
>Hello, I don't know your name,
My name is Jan Sjunnesson, male Swede, on the margin (refrain?) of PhD
studies in philsoophy in the most analytical of all sites, Uppsala, and
coldest (-2 below, now back form Tunisian 22 o C) . . Thanks for your
comments on Spinoza / Deluze, I=B4ll check it out/jan
but you asked if there has been much of a
>response to Deleuze's 'Expressionism in Philosophy'? Most commentators on
>Spinoza since the publication of Expressionism have been influenced by it i=
n
>one way or another and almost all refer to it, especially those publishing =
in
>France - see A. Negri's 'The Savage Anomaly' (Negri says he could not have
>written his book without Deleuze's reading of Spinoza) and E. Balibar. (in
>almost all his papers on Spinoza there are references to Deleuze). There is=
a
>paper by P. Macherey coming out in Paul Patton (ed.) collection on Deleuze
>(Deleuze: a Critical Reader), which deals very critically with Deleuze's
>treatment of Spinoza and with the wider question of historiography in
>Deleuze's method of 'interpreting' in general.
>Of course, the influence of deleuze's reading of Spinoza is not only felt i=
n
>the fairly narrow field of Spinoza scholarship, but elsewhere - in feminism
>for example (Moira Gatens and Genevieve Lloyd). Well, that's all I can thin=
k
>of for the moment. Hope its of some help.