>Deleuze continues saying that Anti-Oedipus was meant to keep people from
>turning into this pulp state, the clinically schizo state. Parnet points
>out
>that the book's enemies criticized it for seeming to be an apology for
>permissivity. Deleuze says that if one reads it closely, one will see that
>it
>always marked out an extreme prudence. The book's lesson: don't become a
>tattered rag; to oppose processes of schizophrenization of the repressive
>hospital type. For D&G, he says, their terror was in producing a "hospital
>creature". The value of what the anti-psychiatrists called the "trip" of
>the
>schizophrenic process was precisely to avoid conjuring the production of
>"loques d'hôpital", pulp-like hospital creatures.
>
Deleuze
>it's a beautiful book, the only book in which that concept of the
>unconscious
>was posed, with the three points of multiplicities of the unconscious and
>of
>delirium, the world/cosmic delirium and not the family delirium, and the
>unconscious as a machine/factory, not a theater. He says he has nothing to
>change in these points, and he hopes that it's a book still to be
>discovered.
>______________
Now this is very lovely
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.