At 09:12 AM 1/30/98 +0700, Undi wrote:
>It's not mere a matter of definition ...
>It's a matter of controlling power & resources ...
>When we start saying 'measure', we start to politicize the meaning of
>our conversation ...
But isn't all interaction political? By entering the process, don't we agree
to play by certain rules that legitimize that power? We agree to work within
that power structure in the interest of legitimizing our own power
(education) within an (ostensibly) equitable atmosphere.
>Our "measure of objectivity" start with our will to power.
And at what point does power meet equity?
>Can design (art & architecture) (academy or practice) escape from this
>will ?
Only to the extent that the individual is willing to subjugate his or her
ego to the greater good.
Mark
>It's not mere a matter of definition ...
>It's a matter of controlling power & resources ...
>When we start saying 'measure', we start to politicize the meaning of
>our conversation ...
But isn't all interaction political? By entering the process, don't we agree
to play by certain rules that legitimize that power? We agree to work within
that power structure in the interest of legitimizing our own power
(education) within an (ostensibly) equitable atmosphere.
>Our "measure of objectivity" start with our will to power.
And at what point does power meet equity?
>Can design (art & architecture) (academy or practice) escape from this
>will ?
Only to the extent that the individual is willing to subjugate his or her
ego to the greater good.
Mark