i wish i could communicate the idea better,
yet it is to include the dimension of time and
indecision so, playing games maybe it can
be considered this, thought it is an attempt
to communicate what is basically a nature
of paradox found in, say, charge, where a
neutral charge (N) co-exists within what is
positive (+) and negative (-) inside of the
structure of the material world, which is
not a two-part system, but three part as
neutral is still a 'charge', even if nothing.
so, instead of the binary yes-no, or +, -,
there is also a neutral position. and there
could be, instead of say 1 and 0, morelike
-1, 0, +1 or more simply -, N, + which is
more closely identical to what is going on
in computation in the form of energy inside
the computer and phone lines and the rest.
so, if you consider the spanning of, say,
-1 to +1 and take out the middle, you have
2 ones, yet only if it is in the realm of the
possible yet not-yet-decided, and not in
the realm of a probability of decision yet
of the range of decision, like a wave that
goes below 0 and above zero and in its
doing so would equal 2, such that -1 and
+1 equal two, or so it would seem. so that
the venn diagram (not a traditional logic,
but a paradoxical logic) would be some-
thing like (1 ) 0 ) and (0 ) 1) simultaneously.
thus, the diagram would be (-1(0)+1) or
even (-(N)+) possibly. i do not know yet
am attempting to do what you say, which
you erased your question to evaluate it by.
--
The Design-L list for art and architecture, since 1992...
To subscribe, send mailto:design-l-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To signoff, send mailto:design-l-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Visit archives: http://lists.psu.edu/archives/design-l.html
yet it is to include the dimension of time and
indecision so, playing games maybe it can
be considered this, thought it is an attempt
to communicate what is basically a nature
of paradox found in, say, charge, where a
neutral charge (N) co-exists within what is
positive (+) and negative (-) inside of the
structure of the material world, which is
not a two-part system, but three part as
neutral is still a 'charge', even if nothing.
so, instead of the binary yes-no, or +, -,
there is also a neutral position. and there
could be, instead of say 1 and 0, morelike
-1, 0, +1 or more simply -, N, + which is
more closely identical to what is going on
in computation in the form of energy inside
the computer and phone lines and the rest.
so, if you consider the spanning of, say,
-1 to +1 and take out the middle, you have
2 ones, yet only if it is in the realm of the
possible yet not-yet-decided, and not in
the realm of a probability of decision yet
of the range of decision, like a wave that
goes below 0 and above zero and in its
doing so would equal 2, such that -1 and
+1 equal two, or so it would seem. so that
the venn diagram (not a traditional logic,
but a paradoxical logic) would be some-
thing like (1 ) 0 ) and (0 ) 1) simultaneously.
thus, the diagram would be (-1(0)+1) or
even (-(N)+) possibly. i do not know yet
am attempting to do what you say, which
you erased your question to evaluate it by.
:-)
playing games here, isn't ?
Pat
--
The Design-L list for art and architecture, since 1992...
To subscribe, send mailto:design-l-subscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To signoff, send mailto:design-l-unsubscribe-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Visit archives: http://lists.psu.edu/archives/design-l.html